SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-07, 04:36 PM   #1
Torpedo Fodder
Ensign
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Whitby, Ontario
Posts: 234
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Seems some people here have reading comprehension problems: If you read the article carefully, you'll note that Britain is not getting rid of all it's cluster bombs, just the ones that lack self-destruct timers, a fact that (as the article also notes) the anti-landmine peacenik crowd is not happy about, since they want all cluster bombs banned.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum - If you want peace, prepare for war.

"Those who turn their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't"

Torpedo Fodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-07, 04:43 PM   #2
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torpedo Fodder
Seems some people here have reading comprehension problems: If you read the article carefully, you'll note that Britain is not getting rid of all it's cluster bombs, just the ones that lack self-destruct timers, a fact that (as the article also notes) the anti-landmine peacenik crowd is not happy about, since they want all cluster bombs banned.
At least one of us looks past the headline - Britain bans 'dumb' cluster bombs

I sure didn't

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-07, 05:30 PM   #3
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Australia removed custer bombs from their stockpile awhile back. It also came up during the 2003 Gulf War where Australia refused to escort American aircraft if they were carrying cluster bombs. Australia was a member of the anit-mine pact agreement.

I understand the usefulness of the bombs, and agree with what Britain is doing by getting rid of the dumb cluster weapons. Haveing timers to detonate leftover cluster orderance is smart as it reduces the risk to civilians as well as your own troop who will most likley try and occupy the place where you droped the weapons.

Your going to have duds despite the best effots of all. I just hope the weapons never have to be used for real.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-07, 07:08 PM   #4
Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

I wonder how well this "smart" crap is gonna even work. If the bomblet had really been working, it should have exploded before it hit the ground. The ones that did not have malfunctioning detonators, so how are they going to detonate themselves after a set time...
Kazuaki Shimazaki II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-07, 06:20 PM   #5
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

That just means more stuff for Tankers to kill!

Hoo'ah!

The M1 is the perfect instrument for destroying waves of enemy armor.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-07, 08:03 PM   #6
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

I hope someone invents a cluster bomb with a detonation percentage above 99%.
Currently its less than 84% often that means over 400 unexploded bomb-lets, which are a real pain for both civilians and our own bomb disposal squads.
A 1% or lower failure rate would persuade me to support cluster bombs fully.

I am totally against cluster bombs that act on "booby trap" fuses that only go off when tampered with.
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-07, 08:09 PM   #7
fatty
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,448
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
I wonder how well this "smart" crap is gonna even work. If the bomblet had really been working, it should have exploded before it hit the ground. The ones that did not have malfunctioning detonators, so how are they going to detonate themselves after a set time...
Good point. How can we expect a bomblet to explode when we want if it already failed to do that in the first place?
fatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-07, 11:51 AM   #8
Torpedo Fodder
Ensign
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Whitby, Ontario
Posts: 234
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatty
Good point. How can we expect a bomblet to explode when we want if it already failed to do that in the first place?
There are many reasons a contact detonatror could fail to detonate the bomblet on impact without it being defective, such as if it lands in loose dirt or soft mud. Just because it failed to detonate on impact doesn't mean a self-destruct would fail to destroy it.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum - If you want peace, prepare for war.

"Those who turn their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't"

Torpedo Fodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.