![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Should the Navy build new nuclear powered surface ships? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 55.56% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 44.44% |
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#9 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,448
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Two reasons why I vote no:
1) Several ports in the world are established "nuclear-free" zones and forbid the operation of such vessels. I think it is more important for the Navy to maintain geographical flexibility - the ability to deploy their most powerful surface warships to any coast in the world. Imagine if New Zealand was struck by a natural disaster and the USN deployed ships to provide aid (think Indian Ocean Tsunami 2004). Any nuclear-powered vessels would have to detatch and idle in the distance. 2) Almost spot on what baggygreen said; terrorists have already punched a nice big hole in a conventionally-powered DDG. It is naive to think that this can never happen again. It would be quite a coup for a nuclear-powered vessel to be stricken while making call in an angry foreign port. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|