NYGM Tonnage War Mod (current v2.6) 8/11/07

[bill clarke]

Stiebler, can you please point me to the NYGM sticky thread ? I cant seem to find it.
Thanks.

[Gizzmoe]

Originally Posted by bill clarke

Stiebler, can you please point me to the NYGM sticky thread ? I cant seem to find it.

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=90285

[Dowly]

Dear NYGM Dev team.

Why is it that you must make dozens of threads all over the SubSim and WaW (Yes, I still read the WaW forums)? Wouldnt they all fit in to the NYGM sticky thread? No offence meant, but like those 'feature revisited' threads are just to get puplicity to NYGM. I assume that you have a documentation from which the player sees what he gets when he installs NYGM. FFS, even make a ONE thread called 'NYGM features revisited' and use it to tell about the features.

And as for the waypoint speed thing.

From WaW:
All in all I feel that the NYGM Random Speed feature makes for a more historical simulation.

And from SubSim:
The waypoint speed variations are of course for the most part a non historical feature.

Make your mind there, mate. It wont kill NYGM if something is not historical.

I go now to rant somewhere else.

[Laffertytig]

ive been away from SH3 for around a year and have just came back to it and found GW and NYGM. lookin at this thread i cant believe the really bitchy attitude of some the guys who r havin a pop at NYGM and this thread in particularly kpt. lehman.

seriously, i think if this thread is annoyin u that much then u cant have much of a life. both mods are great form the commumity so who cares if they made a are thread explaining some features. ive seen enough from the GW lads as well

[sergbuto]

Originally Posted by Laffertytig

ive been away from SH3 for around a year and have just came back to it and found GW and NYGM. lookin at this thread i cant believe the really bitchy attitude of some the guys who r havin a pop at NYGM and this thread in particularly kpt. lehman.

seriously, i think if this thread is annoyin u that much then u cant have much of a life. both mods are great form the commumity so who cares if they made a are thread explaining some features. ive seen enough from the GW lads as well

Since you just come back, my advise is not to hurry up with conclusions on anyone's attitude or "who started what" before reading the old threads. I am not taking any sides (pity that there are sides), just going by history. On second thought, maybe you better not to read old threads. Hopefully things will get smoothed out eventually.

As to "having too many threads", I can admit I hate to read long threads, prefer them to be split. On the other hand, having separate threads such as for every single modified aircraft with working guns may be not really necessary.

Concerning the topic of the thread, nice read btw.

[Gizzmoe]

Originally Posted by Dowly

Dear NYGM Dev team.

Why is it that you must make dozens of threads all over the SubSim and WaW (Yes, I still read the WaW forums)? Wouldnt they all fit in to the NYGM sticky thread? No offence meant, but like those 'feature revisited' threads are just to get puplicity to NYGM.

I agree! Look at the GW team, they only use the GW sticky thread to spread informations. And the "Work Underway on the next Grey Wolves" thread. And "GWX Update"... :hmm:

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Gizzmoe

I agree! Look at the GW team, they only use the GW sticky thread to spread informations. And the "Work Underway on the next Grey Wolves" thread. And "GWX Update"... :hmm:

Dont get me wrong, I meant all the not-so-important threads, it might be just me, but I really cant understand the point of the soon-to-be 2000 'feature revisited' threads. One thread would be enough, sure you get alot of puplicity when every other thread on the forum is 'NYGM feature revisited #'.

Anyways, just my 2 cents, nothing I can do about it.

[raymond6751]

Enough sniping from GW in this thread. Go and browse your own GW stuff and stop filling this thread with nit picking comments that do nobody any service.

I have and use both mods and love them both. Each is marvelous by itself and this cheap shot kind of stuff is unworthy of you.

Personally, I value all information about either mod and would prefer to spend time reading valuable information than a 'war in words' between two modder groups.

It is natural to research the 'other one' but childish to try and belittle their efforts. It isn't necessary guys.

[Immacolata]

Some kids never learn, ray.

Anyways, I must chime in on the fatigue thing. It works okay when you keep your TC low, but as soon as you impatiently scoot across the ocean you get RSI from moving crew about. If you cruise about at 64/128 it isnt felt so badly.

The most elegant solution would be to either lessen or entirely remove the exhaustion/fatiguges efficiency modifier. Let it be up to morale really.

[kylania]

Originally Posted by raymond6751

Enough sniping from GW in this thread.

Umm. the last thing mentioned about GW was nearly a month ago, and all it was was a post pointing out how it's a different mindset. What are you talking about?

[Kpt. Lehmann]

Originally Posted by Gizzmoe

I agree! Look at the GW team, they only use the GW sticky thread to spread informations. And the "Work Underway on the next Grey Wolves" thread. And "GWX Update"... :hmm:

Whatever mate. Whatever... There are just as many threads by the NYGM team buddy.

[Gizzmoe]

Originally Posted by Kpt. Lehmann

Whatever mate. Whatever... There are just as many threads by the NYGM team buddy.

Bingo! That was exactly my point. So why complain about their posting behaviour?

[bigboywooly]

Originally Posted by Gizzmoe

Bingo! That was exactly my point. So why complain about their posting behaviour?

He didnt
Dowly did