Defining terrorism - MI?

[scandium]

Originally Posted by waste gate

Thank you for your reply scandium.

Although you initially agree that all terrorism is to be rejected, you tear into this screed about economic deficets and how Canada is being drawn into Isreal's war on the world. Non of which are the question.

My question was one of those yes/no questions you hear so much about. Try not to cloud the question with hyperbole.

If you cannot answer the question without the intellectual integrety in which it was asked, then you have lost this argument.

Everything I have posted on this, here and in other threads, is based on documented facts as reported by respected international journalists, scholars, human right's advocates, foreign policy experts, former ambassadors, and on and on and I've linked and quoted the articles, and elsewhere linked to the interviews.

Typically, it is met with a 1 or 2 line blanket dismissal or a counterpost citing fringe sites like Little Green Footballs, Powerline, World Net Daily, etc.

Yet I persist because your friends are those who stick by you in times of crisis and attempt to intervene when, through innocent ignorance that most of our hemisphere is under the spell of, that ignorance threatens not only your own future but everyone else's as well.

Although even my patience has its limits, and on this issue I've stated my case and provided the links for you to follow up on. What you do with them is your choice.

And yet you still cannot answer the question. All the 'facts' you say you document via the internet can be contradicted by 'facts' that others contribute via the internet.

Let me ask the question again:
Will you say explicitly that you reject the actions of hezbalah, hamas, al queida, and all other 'terrorist organizations' whether state sponsored or not?

Yes or no question. No internet just you.

[scandium]

Originally Posted by waste gate

And yet you still cannot answer the question. All the 'facts' you say you document via the internet can be contradicted by 'facts' that others contribute via the internet.

Let me ask the question again:
Will you say explicitly that you reject the actions of hezbalah, hamas, al queida, and all other 'terrorist organizations' whether state sponsored or not?

Yes or no question. No internet just you.

I already answered that several posts ago. The answer was yes.

I already answered that several posts ago. The answer was yes.

Then you believe in a war on terror? Another yes/no question.

[scandium]

Originally Posted by waste gate

Then you believe in a war on terror? Another yes/no question.

"A war on terror"? Why stop there? Why not also a War on Drugs or a War on Poverty? Oh wait... that's been tried, though minus the reigning down of bombs on innocent populations (my bad - "collateral damage").

I've already answered that question. If you're looking to have a yes/no game of 20 questions then go find somebody else to play with.

There ya go bringing other issues into the mix again. The sign of a man without conviction. Or who has something to hide.

[Onkel Neal]

Originally Posted by waste gate

And yet you still cannot answer the question. All the 'facts' you say you document via the internet can be contradicted by 'facts' that others contribute via the internet.

Let me ask the question again:
Will you say explicitly that you reject the actions of hezbalah, hamas, al queida, and all other 'terrorist organizations' whether state sponsored or not?

Yes or no question. No internet just you.

Well said