![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Shark above Space Chicken
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
"However vast the darkness, we must provide our own light." Stanley Kubrick "Tomorrow belongs to those who can hear it coming." David Bowie |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Sure, easy. It's not man's fault. It also has nothing to do - according to the paper itself - with the climate. Quote:
Last edited by Dowly; 01-24-23 at 06:04 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
In the Brig
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
The point is it isn’t as clear cut as climate change propagandists think. It was just within the last 150 years years ago that we discovered that nether universe or earths crust is not static . Neither is earths climate. Just like in the ancient days when there was a solar eclipse, draught, hurricane, earth quake, lightening people believed it was their fault that made the gods angry. Same as today, the believers blame themselves and go out and try to convert the unbelievers. Last edited by Rockstar; 01-24-23 at 09:56 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Last times a climate change lead to mass extinction was a drastic change in the permian (but it took millions of years), and the (most probable theory right now) some asteroid drastically changing the climate fast and drastically, towards the end of the cretaceous. What we observe now has no comparison in earth's history. When it quacks and walks like a duck, it probably is one. There could only be two theories that it is not man-made - one is the sun, but changes in the sun's radiation cycles and 'behaviour' have most probably happened before without what we see now. Our sun is a relatively stable star, even over millions of years. - another theory could be the earth's magnetic field getting stronger or weaker, the latter might indeed change the sun wind's intensity reaching the earth because it is not being deflected. But even here the earth's core has changed its direction and revolution several times in earth's history without having much influence on the latter's surface, or climate.
__________________
>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Can you point it to me? It is after all, just four pages long. You seem to be sure about it, so let's see where it mentions climate?
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
In the Brig
![]() |
![]()
So one says there can ONLY be two theories and the other posts Youtube videos and proclaims such things as the best explanation. And that’s what you think science is and should convince everyone else?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
In the Brig
![]() |
![]()
The best explanation? Not geo thermal venting, not the sun, not milankovc cycles, not earths core. There is so much more to science than it’s all our fault, Greta and YouTube.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
You complain in this very thread that you don't believe in AGW because it is politicized, yet you are the only one in this thread politicizing it.
Most of this thread is just you projecting onto others what you are doing yourself. Politicizing, blind belief, bad science and on and on. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
中国水兵
![]() Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 280
Downloads: 190
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It's very simple so simple, Albert Gore should have figured it out before his book!
![]() Christopher Tarana |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() Quote:
You are wholly welcome to provide alternate theories to explain the changing climate. But of course, you don't. Because you don't have any. Then show the studies and we can all have a look at them together. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
In the Brig
![]() |
![]()
Read again, I just did, geo thermal venting, sun cycles, milankovic cycles, and now a group suggested the earths core.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|