|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should the US and NATO maintain forward deployed nukes in Europe? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
16 | 61.54% |
| No |
  
|
8 | 30.77% |
| Unsure |
  
|
2 | 7.69% |
| Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-01-06, 04:03 PM
|
#6 |
|
Admiral
 Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
Indeed. It could start WW3, or not, it could destroy the whole world, or just a small area of the globe, spread some radioactive clouds, but far from being armageddon.
I need more information to answer the question. How much do these nukes cost to maintain? Who pays for them? Which areas would loose the quick-strike coverage thing if the nukes were removed? Draw a map please.   
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode