![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#11 | ||
XO
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 431
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 1
|
![]() Quote:
The believe of the all-powerfull USA tech is growed by books and films. If you read Clancy's books (specially the last ones), the Americans are the best in all and the rest are poor countries that can't do anything by themselves. So, the rocked that launched the Apolo missions were designed for Germans, the ICBMs also. The Atomic bomb too. Norwegians (is correct the spell?) are the best country about oceanography, and that includes study of underwater sound propagation, ocean salinity and temperature and so on... A lot of scientific discoveries in America are made by European an Asian people that works for the Americas. That's because the U.S. have the money and the will. I agree that the overall of all radar, sonar, missiles, communications, vehicles... are the best on the world. But I can't see why not that country can be better in that kind of sensor, and that other country be better in avionics... And there's another thing: the objetive. You can not have all things on the same sensor and can not put all kind of sensors on the same ship. As an example, the cats have great night vission and can see objets in movement with great accuracy. On exange, they have not very good periferical sight. Same thing happens with sonar. The Americans needed a specific kind of sonar, that can receive data on determinate range and frequency becuase their doctrine and the enemy (the Soviet Union). Maybe the Americans have the best capacity for tracking nuclear boomers, but not diesels on shallow waters because that was not the priority. Quote:
__________________
Hay dos tipos de buques: los submarinos... y los blancos. There are two types of ships: the subs... and the targets. Last edited by FERdeBOER; 06-23-06 at 11:22 AM. |
||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|