![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Grey Wolf
![]() |
![]()
Have to second pretty much everything Catfish has said. Generally, doctrine was to always be moving toward the target vs lying in wait, so often times they would approach even at five or six knots when running in from the front submerged, slowing down to take periscope peeks, then slowing to approach speed within 4-5000 m. The commander’s handbook stressed the shot needs to fall at the earliest possible moment.
I would show a U-boat on a parallel but opposite course, at periscope depth, perhaps 1500 m off the target track.
__________________
Ask me anything about the Type VII or IX! One-Stop Targeting Shop: https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...WwBt-1vjW28JbO My YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIJ...9FXbD3S2kgwdPQ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Okay, so after May 1943, I guess the tactic shifted more to lying ahead in wait - would you agree?
I guess I need to review the handbook, but I have references stating that at some point the type VII and IX only got one shot because they couldn't catch up with the convoys after that.
__________________
![]() "I like subcommanders...they dont have time for bull****!" Proud member of the Subsim army of zombies Becks website |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() |
![]()
I would say from that time on, many attacks were happening from outside of the perimeter of the convoy. Diving directly in front and approaching and entering the convoy from the front became a less viable tactic at that point.
__________________
Ask me anything about the Type VII or IX! One-Stop Targeting Shop: https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...WwBt-1vjW28JbO My YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIJ...9FXbD3S2kgwdPQ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|