SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > Sub & Naval Discussions: World Naval News, Books, & Films
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-20, 07:46 AM   #1
ikalugin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 3,212
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


Default

ROK has a favourable military balance against DPRK even if we account for DPRK non strategic nuclear options as force multipliers. So in a sense ROK does not need nuclear weapons for warfighting or deterring an invasion.
__________________
Grumpy as always.
ikalugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-20, 07:01 AM   #2
Rufus Shinra
Soundman
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: The land of the free with a glorious military history (France)
Posts: 141
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikalugin View Post
ROK has a favourable military balance against DPRK even if we account for DPRK non strategic nuclear options as force multipliers. So in a sense ROK does not need nuclear weapons for warfighting or deterring an invasion.
It does not *need* them per se, but having a balance of terror makes relations much more polite and courteous altogether. I doubt many neighbours would protest much if SK acquired nuclear-tipped SRBM in a relatively transparent program (AKA if they allowed Chinese and Japanese inspections of the program to reassure both of them about the missiles' capabilities).
Rufus Shinra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-20, 01:41 PM   #3
ikalugin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 3,212
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus Shinra View Post
It does not *need* them per se, but having a balance of terror makes relations much more polite and courteous altogether. I doubt many neighbours would protest much if SK acquired nuclear-tipped SRBM in a relatively transparent program (AKA if they allowed Chinese and Japanese inspections of the program to reassure both of them about the missiles' capabilities).

There is a balance of terror. Nuclear weapons are, well, weapons - you can achieve similar effects through other means.
__________________
Grumpy as always.
ikalugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-20, 03:33 PM   #4
Jeff-Groves
GLOBAL MODDING TERRORIST
 
Jeff-Groves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,652
Downloads: 137
Uploads: 0


Default

I'd think they'd be better served to do cheap drones that projected a bigger threat.
Jeff-Groves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-20, 03:55 AM   #5
Rufus Shinra
Soundman
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: The land of the free with a glorious military history (France)
Posts: 141
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikalugin View Post
There is a balance of terror. Nuclear weapons are, well, weapons - you can achieve similar effects through other means.
Not as effectively or cheaply.
Rufus Shinra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-20, 08:39 AM   #6
ikalugin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 3,212
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus Shinra View Post
Not as effectively or cheaply.

Yet ROK is significantly stronger conventionally for such a balance to exist. And this is not the first time - think of 1940s (and to lesser extend in 1960s) when USSR either didn't have nuclear weapons or was at a significant disadvantage.


Yet through the conventional advantage in Europe the balance has been maintained.
__________________
Grumpy as always.
ikalugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
north korea

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.