![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I can't really understand who 'they' are ... all I know is that 'they' have been telling me what 'they' think for a long time now, but 'they' aren't always right, so I think 'they' should have their own web page where 'they' can explain what 'they' think and leave us normal people alone.
![]()
__________________
pla•teau noun a relatively stable level, period, or condition a level of attainment or achievement Lord help me get to the next plateau .. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
In the Brig
![]() |
![]() How did the writer conclude the 2 million year old tools found in China really are from immigrants that latest evidence suggest left Africa 60,000 years ago? Where did he get the idea that to force the theory to fit these African immigrants MUST have left earlier than latest evidence indicates or first thought? All I'm saying is the article doesn't make sense TOO ME. Wouldn't the latest discovery in China make the writer think just for a moment of the possibility that maybe, just maybe East Asia or another location other than Africa may be the well spring of life? Hence my remark how places like the Smithsonian cant afford to entertain other ideas. Do you have opinion thought or idea on the matter? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
In the Brig
![]() |
![]() Oh, I see. Desiring to hear evolutionists explain how a mere piece of matter became a conscience animated being is a low I.Q. question? Or was it my opinion they are more interested in protecting ego and funds than entertaining other ideas. Such as the possibility Africa may not be the cradle of humankind? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|