![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 513
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Poland
Posts: 93
Downloads: 123
Uploads: 1
|
![]() Quote:
Hello Traveller, thank You for the permission. Traveller v2.6 TMO 1.0 patch This patch fixes the incorrect exit dates for some Japanese coastal guns to be more historically accurate. I uploaded this patch on Subsim download section in the category - Silent Hunter 4 / Gameplay mods: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/down...o=file&id=5295 If i plan to release any further patches for Traveller v2.6 TMO mod i will let You know via PM. Last edited by p.jakub88; 09-21-17 at 05:27 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Traveller, I think p.jakub88 is going to do right by your mod and make you look mighty good. The conversations I've had with him have convinced me that he's the right guy to do this.
It would be great to see Traveller's mod become popular again. And it is great to see new modders paying tribute to the great modders who came before.
__________________
Sub Skipper's Bag of Tricks, Slightly Subnuclear Mk 14 & Cutie, Slightly Subnuclear Deck Gun, EZPlot 2.0, TMOPlot, TMOKeys, SH4CMS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Poland
Posts: 93
Downloads: 123
Uploads: 1
|
![]() Quote:
Hello Rockin Robbins, thank You Sir! ![]() In general the Traveller v2.6 TMO is a good mod and has many nice features. I made few other additional changes in it, but only for my personal use, because people wouldn't like those changes. In example i made all enemy planes hitpoints values like the stock SH4, because i thought it was too difficult to shot them down in the Traveller v2.6 TMO mod. However, Bleiente disagreed with me. I wanted to avoid conflict on the Subsim forum, so i abandoned the idea. I stated only, that most Japanese planes at that time had no armor protection and no self-sealing fuel tanks - which is a fact not my opinion. P.S. Could You reply to a PM that i sent to You on 17.09? Thank You in advance. Last edited by p.jakub88; 09-22-17 at 04:37 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 513
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
Perfectly correct - it's way too easy to shoot a fast-flying aircraft with the Flak.
It does not matter that Japanese planes did not have self-locking tanks. keep going! |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Poland
Posts: 93
Downloads: 123
Uploads: 1
|
![]() Quote:
In American planes You could still carry out Your mission even with the punctured fuel tanks because they were coated in rubber, in Japanese not because they weren't self sealing. Self sealing fuel tanks made the plane heavier, so Japanese constructors decided to not mount them on most planes. The agility of Mitsubishi Zero came with a price for their pilots. For the other hand i.e. the Grumman company made their planes more resistant and they could withstand more damage and offered better protection for pilots. Last edited by p.jakub88; 09-23-17 at 02:57 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|