![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Sailor man
![]() Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 44
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Personally, I would rather have ESM tracks to provide classification (ignoring that in real life different platforms might use the same radars for the sake of simplicity), and active intercept tracks to create targets that can be TMAed (slowly, unless tracked by a passive Sonar array).
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 395
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 1
|
![]() Quote:
What I'm talking about is, when you get either an active intercept return or an ESM contact with a lot of uncertainty a contact is placed on the map at an arbitrary position (say 10 miles out?) with a NIL listed range (in other words when you click on it, instead of saying 5.5k yards, it has a NIL/Unknown value for range, letting you know the range is not known and its not necessarily where its marked on the map, other than along that approximate bearing, so you get some visualization as to the number of contacts you have out there). My (admittedly limited) understanding of both ESM (with the obvious exception of its reconnaissance / information gathering value) and Active Intercept is that both of these exist as warning systems first and foremost (something is pinging / radiating somewhere off to the NE of us) than they are a means for classifying (obviously they can do this and probably pretty well) or even localizing a contact.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hooper, UT
Posts: 80
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT: As a side note, I just saw that my Forum Rank is now A-Ganger. I find myself slightly insulted. Not really, but the true A-Gangers will understand that I don't want (nor deserve, at some levels) to wear their name. On the other hand, it is fairly low in the rankings, so maybe all it well in the world. Unless Sonarman isn't in the ranking somewhere higher? Where it should be? ![]()
__________________
STS1(SS) USN (Ret) : 1997 - 2017 USS MICHIGAN (SSBN-727 BLUE) USS MONTPELIER (SSN-765) IMF PACNORWEST USS ALASKA (SSBN-732 GOLD) USS ALABAMA (SSBN-731 GOLD) NAVAL OCEAN PROCESSING FACILITY, WHIDBEY ISLAND USS TENNESSEE (SSBN-734 GOLD) Last edited by Shadriss; 08-02-17 at 09:06 PM. Reason: Rambling |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|