SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > COLD WATERS
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-02-17, 03:26 PM   #1
Destex
Sailor man
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 44
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadriss View Post
it would be far easier and safer (for the ship) to just use PBB and PNB instead.
That's for sure. In the context of Cold Waters gameplay, do you think that tracking ESM contacts should contribute to TMA solutions?

Personally, I would rather have ESM tracks to provide classification (ignoring that in real life different platforms might use the same radars for the sake of simplicity), and active intercept tracks to create targets that can be TMAed (slowly, unless tracked by a passive Sonar array).
__________________
Destex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-17, 04:03 PM   #2
The Bandit
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 395
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destex View Post
That's for sure. In the context of Cold Waters gameplay, do you think that tracking ESM contacts should contribute to TMA solutions?

Personally, I would rather have ESM tracks to provide classification (ignoring that in real life different platforms might use the same radars for the sake of simplicity), and active intercept tracks to create targets that can be TMAed (slowly, unless tracked by a passive Sonar array).
Well I'd suggest the same way it was done in SC / Dangerous Waters (don't really mean the classification part but that would be nice).

What I'm talking about is, when you get either an active intercept return or an ESM contact with a lot of uncertainty a contact is placed on the map at an arbitrary position (say 10 miles out?) with a NIL listed range (in other words when you click on it, instead of saying 5.5k yards, it has a NIL/Unknown value for range, letting you know the range is not known and its not necessarily where its marked on the map, other than along that approximate bearing, so you get some visualization as to the number of contacts you have out there).

My (admittedly limited) understanding of both ESM (with the obvious exception of its reconnaissance / information gathering value) and Active Intercept is that both of these exist as warning systems first and foremost (something is pinging / radiating somewhere off to the NE of us) than they are a means for classifying (obviously they can do this and probably pretty well) or even localizing a contact.
__________________
The Bandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-17, 09:04 PM   #3
Shadriss
A-ganger
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hooper, UT
Posts: 80
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destex View Post
In the context of Cold Waters gameplay, do you think that tracking ESM contacts should contribute to TMA solutions?
Yes, but in specific circumstances. It is possible in the game to have ESM contact with a SAG, but not yet have gained them passively. In such a case, having at least a bearing is useful. I wouldn't want them to contribute in the same way Sonar does, but if you are willing to keep your masts out of the water that long, I'd be ok with a very slow TMA build over time. Very slow. Think glacial drift.

Quote:
Personally, I would rather have ESM tracks to provide classification (ignoring that in real life different platforms might use the same radars for the sake of simplicity), and active intercept tracks to create targets that can be TMAed (slowly, unless tracked by a passive Sonar array).
From a gameplay standpoint, agreed for the most part. For Active Intercept, the bearings are, for all intents and purposes, gold. Unlike the current system where they contribute nothing, Active Intercept needs to have the same contributions and effect as passives for TMA purposes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bandit View Post
My (admittedly limited) understanding of both ESM... and Active Intercept is that both of these exist as warning systems first and foremost ... than they are a means for classifying... or even localizing a contact.
ESM is somewhat like that certainly, for the reasons that have been discussed. Active Intercept as it's currently implemented was designed for both. I can't get into the hows and whys, but suffice it to say that we rely on it pretty heavily for classification cues if there is active sonar being used.

EDIT: As a side note, I just saw that my Forum Rank is now A-Ganger. I find myself slightly insulted. Not really, but the true A-Gangers will understand that I don't want (nor deserve, at some levels) to wear their name. On the other hand, it is fairly low in the rankings, so maybe all it well in the world. Unless Sonarman isn't in the ranking somewhere higher? Where it should be?
__________________
STS1(SS) USN (Ret) : 1997 - 2017
USS MICHIGAN (SSBN-727 BLUE)
USS MONTPELIER (SSN-765)
IMF PACNORWEST
USS ALASKA (SSBN-732 GOLD)
USS ALABAMA (SSBN-731 GOLD)
NAVAL OCEAN PROCESSING FACILITY, WHIDBEY ISLAND
USS TENNESSEE (SSBN-734 GOLD)

Last edited by Shadriss; 08-02-17 at 09:06 PM. Reason: Rambling
Shadriss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.