![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 567
Downloads: 210
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
Yes, the war goes on without you, but at the same time it makes no sense for COMSUBLANT to assign a new mission to a boat they know to be combat ineffective.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: AZ & DC
Posts: 487
Downloads: 48
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It seems it would be the Commander's call on whether the sub is mission capable.
But, in the same sense, the Commander recognizes his responsibility to stay mission capable for follow-on taskings in a war. National budgets being national budgets, taking command of anything calls for responsibility to accomplish the duties of command, knowing the importance of staying mission-capable during said command. There should be some "career" set-back for losing mission capability. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well, but you get to refuse it in this game just by running towards port nevertheless. Ain't THAT nice enough already?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|