|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: No underwater external repairs, are you ready? | |||
| Bring it on. Repairing the bow planes at 100 metres under a depth charge attack is silly |
   
|
63 | 90.00% |
| You got to be kidding! Surely the Germans were advanced enough to repair anything up to 275 metres |
  
|
7 | 10.00% |
| Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
05-10-06, 11:34 AM
|
#1 |
|
Sonar Guy
 Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 394
Downloads: 30
Uploads: 0
|
I think U-Schultz has some valid points there, which should be take into consideration, but...
Due to the fact that most damage is caused by DC, the blast could either bend, rip apart or dislodge the (lets say) diveplane. Internal damage in this case would be from vibration and shock only and insignificant. Totally agree that external components (dive planes, rudder, prop) should be fixed on the surface. Cheers!
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
