|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you want a third-party, external replayviewer? | |||
| Yes, any external replayviewer would help. |
   
|
22 | 64.71% |
| Yes, the featured mentioned would make it cool enough to use. |
  
|
5 | 14.71% |
| No, I'll wait for SCS to make one. |
  
|
4 | 11.76% |
| No, I don't use them. |
  
|
3 | 8.82% |
| Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-28-06, 09:04 AM
|
#11 |
|
Silent Hunter
 Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
/OT Rant mode on
I think "most people" that play hardcore military sims like DW know what the frak a Maverick is and can tell modeling it such that the range is over twice what it has in real life absofrackinlutely ridiculous. Getting it fixed is much less obscure than wanting the fictitious "65cm torpedo" replaced with the real 65-76 wakehomer, which people also justifiably bitched about. Anyone who didn't notice just "isn't familiar with the problem," http://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/h...-foul-language. :P   and anyone who didn't care doesn't give a rat's ass about realism, in which case they have earned a GSGT Hartman-esque evaluation of their personal worth./OT rant mode off Ah, that feels better!
__________________
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode