Hitler would've won the war if. . .

[STEED]

Originally Posted by micky1up

yet again steed you deal in absolute's " theres no way " well im afraid many battle's in history have hung on the smallest things like i said according to your rules gemany shouldnt have been able to defeat france and the belgians and the BEF they had more supply's men tanks adequate air support so how did germany accomplish that? by your rule that the combatant with the better logistics win every time ! no so my friend classic example a fleet crossing 8000 miles to retake the falklands against land based air support and entrecnched soildiers by your rules the uk shouldnt have been able to do that but it did because morale tactics and training can overcome large obsticals , another example warterloo napoleon had more men more supplies yet he failed to defeat wellington why? theres more to the equation than more men more tanks more supplies = win

Not my rules facts. I suggest you start reading about the Eastern Front and understand it.

In the case of 1940 Hitler's army had been tested in Poland and they used a new method of war fare Blitzkrieg and a very daring plan to come through the Ardennes. And any way it was only us the British who put up a real fight unlike the French.

In the case of Waterloo Napoleon won a tactical victory until Blucher came on the scene and turn it around.