The Coup D'etat of November 1963

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

Except for the part where in the film the spray is clearly flying forward.


I already quoted the right-side photo. My quote showed diagrams of the head, and the part that was blown out was the center, neither front nor back. From that alone the bullet could have entered from either direction.


It only makes no sense to you because you are already convinced that you know the truth, and you don't. You've said that bit about inconsistency and evidence many times, yet you've failed to show the inconsistency. It's what you want to believe. As I've said, I don't pretend to know one way or the other, but what you keep claiming as "proof" is nothing of the kind.


Nothing proven. It has been shown that the shot could have easily come from either direction.


Only "magic" if the subjects were sitting a certain way. It has been shown that it would be easy for them to be sitting in another position and the bullet suddenly travels in a straight line. Not "magic" at all.


Also multiple accounts of other things that couldn't possibly have happened, and from the same witnesses.


What "impossible shots" would those be. It has been shown many times that Oswald could easily have made those shots, yet you keep ignoring that.


Proves nothing at all. If there was proof, there wouldn't be all these people still trying to prove it. So far you have no proof at all, just the claims and the willingness to believe.


Again you have to resort to allegation, because there is nothing else. Either you have proof of a conspiracy or you don't. So far you don't, despite what you keep claiming.


Only to someone who already believes. Your mind is made up, and you keep arguing "facts" that have been shown to be wrong, or at least questionable, and ignoring everything to the contrary.

The "forward" spray is from the side/back blowout, some blew forward as his head snaps back, you know from the frontal impact. Any diagrams, esp ones put forth by the government are suspect, they do not match the photographic or video evidence nor correlate with the many of the eye witnesses testimony.

For a long time I accepted Oswald was the shooter until I looked into it.Once I understood about the old guard in the CIA at the time, Dulles, Helms etc, Kennedy taking on the old guard, the military-industrial complex, the federal reserve and the connections were made over the years.Understanding how dirty LBJ was and his connections to this, it makes a lot of sense.Much like in court, it's not always what you know, it is what you can prove.A lot of people tend to take the official word of the government and did until the zapruder film came out, so much has came out over the years.Evidence is pretty overwhelming showing a conspiracy, showing more than one shooter and the visual evidence clearly shows he was hit in the front/side of the head, despite the lies pushed by the officials.E Howard Hunt's deathbed confession.Congressman Hale Boggs of the Warren Commission(who died under mysterious circumstances) disagreed with the one shooter verdict of the commission.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

The "forward" spray is from the side/back blowout, some blew forward as his head snaps back, you know from the frontal impact.

No. Spray follows the path of the bullet that made it. It all blows forward in the film, not some.

For a long time I accepted Oswald was the shooter until I looked into it.

One has to wonder exactly how deeply you did look into it.

Understanding how dirty LBJ was and his connections to this, it makes a lot of sense.

Yes, it does make sense when looked at it the right way. That doesn't make it remotely true.

Much like in court, it's not always what you know, it is what you can prove.

Come again? You keep speaking of what you "know", and yet you can prove nothing.

Evidence is pretty overwhelming showing a conspiracy

Only if you already believe it. I've shown that the evidence in hand can be taken either way.

showing more than one shooter and the visual evidence clearly shows he was hit in the front/side of the head

Showing nothing of the kind, unless you already see it that way. The wound itself shows no frontal entry or rear exit. The damage is all on the side. It has been shown by shooters here that the head can snap either way when hit, especially by a bullet that passes through.

despite the lies pushed by the officials.

E Howard Hunt's deathbed confession.

The same E. Howard Hunt who had a long reputation for lying about various things, including forging documents? He could be telling the truth, or he might not have been.

Congressman Hale Boggs of the Warren Commission(who died under mysterious circumstances) disagreed with the one shooter verdict of the commission.

There's nothing mysterious about it. The plane he was on disappeared. It was never found. Whatever his relationship to the investigations, it happens all the time. Conspiracy theorists are convinced he was gotten rid of. There is no evidence at all one way or the other, no matter how "mysterious" you may find it.