Conspiracies, sheeple, the universe and everything

[AVGWarhawk]

He'll sign it swiftly.

[Oberon]

The FEMA death camps are on standby awaiting your call!

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

ridiculous.

Funny, that word crossed my mind right after reading your post, what a coincidence!

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Apparently John Kerry will sign the UN Arms Treaty tomorrow. The treasonous behavior of this admin just never ends.

How exactly is this treason? Please explain in full sentences with references. Calling something treason doesn't make it so. If it is treason, what can be done about it? What is being done about it?

Yes, I am sure the usual actors will chime in and defend it here

If you were a regular reader of this particular forum you would recognize that the phrase you just used is common here, and it always has one of two purposes. Either it is used defensively, because the poster is not really as sure of himself as he claims to be, or it is used dismissively to support trolling. We have one member who starts every thread he creates with "I can't wait to see what the usual suspects have to say about this." As soon as you dismiss any opposition with a challenge like that you admit that your position is weak.

but it is no secret the UN seeks to disarm everyone.

Isn't it? Can you show this to be true, or is it just another paranoid cry in the dark? You have made so many claims like this that have been proven false that this time you need to show actual citations and references.

Luckily, the Senate will not ratify it but the fact these traitors would even sign such a monstrosity, is ridiculous.

Again, show that it is treason, how and why, or retract your use of the phrase "traitors". If you can prove it, fine. If you can't then you yourself are one of "the usual actors", and are guilty of trolling.

[razark]

Ok, so the UN is going to take all the guns, but Obama is trying to get the first. That's why the DHS bought all the ammunition, so they can distribute it to Obama's private army, armed with all the confiscated guns that are hidden in bunkers disguised as FEMA concentration camps where they film fake moon landings?

Can I motion a suggestion that this be merged with the Conspiracies thread?

Not until someone mentions the secret army of Nazi dentists.

[Platapus]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

... it is no secret the UN seeks to disarm everyone.Luckily, the Senate will not ratify it but the fact these traitors would even sign such a monstrosity, is ridiculous.

Yeah, because the UN has such a good history of taking guns away in other countries.

Big secret. No one but a select few on the Internets Tubes knows the "real truth".

Can you name one country that the United Nations, since 1945, has been able to impose, by themselves, a disarmament of the citizens?

I would really like to see a citation on this.

[eddie]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Not until someone mentions the secret army of Nazi dentists.

[Catfish]

Nazi dentists? So it must be true ..

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Not until someone mentions the secret army of Nazi dentists.

Get over yourself, really.

[Oberon]

Ein Volk! Ein Reich! Ein Fluorine!

[Bubblehead1980]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

How exactly is this treason? Please explain in full sentences with references. Calling something treason doesn't make it so. If it is treason, what can be done about it? What is being done about it?


If you were a regular reader of this particular forum you would recognize that the phrase you just used is common here, and it always has one of two purposes. Either it is used defensively, because the poster is not really as sure of himself as he claims to be, or it is used dismissively to support trolling. We have one member who starts every thread he creates with "I can't wait to see what the usual suspects have to say about this." As soon as you dismiss any opposition with a challenge like that you admit that your position is weak.


Isn't it? Can you show this to be true, or is it just another paranoid cry in the dark? You have made so many claims like this that have been proven false that this time you need to show actual citations and references.


Again, show that it is treason, how and why, or retract your use of the phrase "traitors". If you can prove it, fine. If you can't then you yourself are one of "the usual actors", and are guilty of trolling.

The UN weapons treaty has a registration mechanism included for imports that would require a signatory government to collect data on the "end user" ie the purchaser and keep that data for 10 years, sharing it with over governments "concerned" such as where said weapon was imported.The potential for misuse of this is a threat to the rights of citizens in not only US but that of any nation who signs this monstrosity.Yes, this is treason, betraying the citizens of the United States to the UN.They can't get a registration law passed in the US, so they are trying to get some weapons registered via a treaty.This is saying "international law" holds more weight than our own laws, which is ceding our sovereignty in some regards.Absolutely unacceptable and illegal so once again, yes it is treason. Of course, Kerry is doing this on the orders of Dear Leader.

Also, this further empowers the UN, which is a threat to liberty of every human on the planet. No treaty that empowers it to do ANYTHING should be signed.The UN is about as an evil of an organization as there ever has been, perhaps only second to the Democratic Party or maybe the Nazi Party.

Yes, I know some jabs at the Dems is "partisan" but it sure was fun.

[Dowly]

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp

M'kay?

PS. You are stupid and you smell bad.

[mapuc]

Here's some more thoughts. On the 12th of September I came to think of this radio show Coast to Coast AM, and wondered if they had anything about 9/11 and of course they did.

In this show, they talked to some journalist that had made his own investigation about 9/11.

Now here's my thought.

If I have a standpoint wouldn't that effect the outcome of my investigation?

Let say that I'm convinced that the US-government is behind it. will it not then be on the result of my investigation?

Markus

[Dread Knot]

Originally Posted by mapuc

If I have a standpoint wouldn't that effect the outcome of my investigation?

Let say that I'm convinced that the US-government is behind it. will it not then be on the result of my investigation?

Yes... they have a term for that. It's called confirmation bias.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias