SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-24-13, 06:43 AM   #1
u crank
Old enough to know better
 
u crank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Prince Edward Island
Posts: 11,748
Downloads: 136
Uploads: 0


Default

Welcome to SubSim Boarspear2061.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boarspear2061 View Post
Also, we have been thinking about trying a Type IX for the first time, and maybe doing long range patrols against the USA or something like that later in the war. Is there a particular flotilla we should be in for that to be realistic?
Both the 2nd and 10th Flotillas operating out of Lorient used Type IX U-boats.
They also operated out of Bordeaux with the 12th Flotilla.
__________________

“Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.”

― Arthur C. Clarke




u crank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-13, 01:12 PM   #2
Kelly621
Officer
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 237
Downloads: 336
Uploads: 0
Default

BoarSpear2061,
Here is the info I have on the Type IX boats most of the data comes from Gordon Williamson's book.

Type IXA
Length: 76.5m
Beam: 6.5m
Draft: 4.7m
Displacement: 1,032 tons surfaced 1,153 tons submerged
Speed 18.2 knots surfaced 7.7 knots submerged
Range: 8,100 nautical miles surfaced 65 nautical miles submerged
Propulsion: (2) MAN 2,200 bhp MWM diesels (2) ssw 500 bhp electric motors
Torpedoes: 4 bow tubes and 2 stern tubes. 22 torpedoes carried.
Crew: 48

Type IXB
A small increase in fuel capacity over the IXA and the deck gun was positioned a bit closer to the conning tower. There were 14 built.
Length: 76.5m
Beam: 6.8m
Draft: 4.7m
Displacement: 1,061 tons surfaced 1,178 tons submerged
Speed 18.2 knots surfaced 7.3 knots submerged
Range: 8,700 nautical miles surfaced 64 nautical miles submerged
Propulsion: (2) MAN 2,200 bhp MWM diesels (2) ssw 500 bhp electric motors
Torpedoes: 4 bow tubes and 2 stern tubes. 22 torpedoes carried.
Crew: 48

Type IXC
Increased fuel capacity over previous versions. 54 were built.
Length: 76.8m
Beam: 6.8m
Draft: 4.7m
Displacement: 1,120 tons surfaced 1,232 tons submerged
Speed 18.3 knots surfaced 7.3 knots submerged
Range: 11,000 nautical miles surfaced 63 nautical miles submerged
Propulsion: (2) MAN 2,200 bhp MWM diesels (2) ssw 500 bhp electric motors
Torpedoes: 4 bow tubes and 2 stern tubes. 22 torpedoes carried.
Crew: 48

Type IXC/40
A small increase in fuel capacity. 87 were built.
Length: 76.8m
Beam: 6.9m
Draft: 4.7m
Displacement: 1,144 tons surfaced 1,257 tons submerged
Speed 18.3 knots surfaced 7.3 knots submerged
Range: 11,400 nautical miles surfaced 63 nautical miles submerged
Propulsion: (2) MAN 2,200 bhp MWM diesels (2) ssw 500 bhp electric motors
Torpedoes: 4 bow tubes and 2 stern tubes. 22 torpedoes carried.
Crew: 48

Type IXD1
Only 2 built (U180 and U195). They changed the propulsion to 6 Daimler Benz MB501 (3 per shaft) to increase the boats speed...Turned out to be an unreliable technical nightmare. Ended up being reconverted to cargo carriers.

Type IXD2
A unique and successful Type IX. 28 were built. It had a longer hull that allowed a twin propulsion system. Two diesels propelled in on the surface while two supercharged diesels were used to quickly recharge the batteries.
Length: 87.6m
Beam: 7.5m
Draft: 5.4m
Displacement: 1,616 tons surfaced 1,804 tons submerged
Speed 19.2 knots surfaced 6.9 knots submerged
Range: 23,700 nautical miles surfaced 57 nautical miles submerged
Propulsion: (2) MAN 2,200 bhp MWM diesels (i think) and (2) supercharged cyclinder 2,200 bhp diesels(2) ssw 580 bhp electric motors
Torpedoes: 4 forward tubes and 2 stern tubes. 24 torpedoes carried.
Crew: 57

As far as dive time, It was a general estimate from a few of the books I have that the Type IX was around ten seconds slower in a crash dive then a Type VII. Of course that is just an estimated time...since factors such as sea state, speed, crew reaction time etc, could change the time one way or another.

Hope this helps.....
Kelly621
Kelly621 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-13, 04:43 PM   #3
Boarspear2061
Swabbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alabama, USA
Posts: 8
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Thanks a lot, everyone. This si all very useful, I really appreciate the help.
Boarspear2061 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-13, 11:14 AM   #4
sublynx
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the conning tower of my VIIC scanning the sea through the periscope
Posts: 1,698
Downloads: 173
Uploads: 7
Default

Here's a link to a design study the US Navy made after the war

http://www.uboatarchive.net/DesignStudiesTypeIXC.htm

There's more nice info on both type VII's and IX's on the links down the page. Click "design studies"
sublynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.