It must be a hoax

[Tchocky]

Originally Posted by Jimbuna

Can we all lighten up...everyone should have a right to express themselves as long as they are acting within the boundaries of the law and not intentionally provoking others on the grounds of racism etc.

And the point is he wasn't allowed paint the door according to his rental contract. So there's your law.

And nobody can seriously claim that the flag is racially provocative. So that gets rid of that.

instead GT is turning it into the usual gripefest about awful politicians and how we're all doomed to a sexless emotionless politically correct hellscape.

[mapuc]

Originally Posted by Tchocky

And the point is he wasn't allowed paint the door according to his rental contract. So there's your law.

And nobody can seriously claim that the flag is racially provocative. So that gets rid of that.

instead GT is turning it into the usual gripefest about awful politicians and how we're all doomed to a sexless emotionless politically correct hellscape.

But why now after 10 years?? That's my question

The landlord must have passed his door several times during those 10 years, so why, first now??

Markus

[Platapus]

Originally Posted by Tchocky

And the point is he wasn't allowed paint the door according to his rental contract. So there's your law.

And nobody can seriously claim that the flag is racially provocative. So that gets rid of that.

instead GT is turning it into the usual gripefest about awful politicians and how we're all doomed to a sexless emotionless politically correct hellscape.

Places for People, which owns Mr Rolfe’s house, has since apologised for calling the flag offensive but insists its tenant must repaint the door because he did not have the proper permission to turn it into an England flag.

Subsim.com Making mountains out of molehills.....

Subsim.com Making mountains out of molehills.....

Has subsim become the daily mail?