SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-13, 09:33 PM   #1
tsotha
Watch
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorpX View Post
Yes and No. If you are only considering the simplified problem with a triangle and constant speed vectors of the target and torpedo. BUT, in RL, torpedos do not accelerate instantly, nor do they always start at the set depth. Most likely, the torpedo will sink some, accelerate and climb to it's set depth (if all goes well), and then proceed at a constant speed to the target.
That makes sense. But did the TDCs of the era take all that into account?
tsotha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-13, 10:16 AM   #2
Hitman
Pacific Aces Dev Team
 
Hitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 6,109
Downloads: 109
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
If you are only considering the simplified problem with a triangle and constant speed vectors of the target and torpedo.
Even then there will be a small difference due to the periscope or uzo being 35 metres behind the torpedo. But IIRC the TDC did take that into account.

Quote:
But did the TDCs of the era take all that into account?
I think so, but based on average preprogrammed value. There were no input settings for that.

In general, commanders knew that and thus simply minimized the error getting close and trying to hit the broadside, as a minor deviation on a 150 metres long hull at 90º can still mean a hit.
__________________
One day I will return to sea ...
Hitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-13, 02:35 AM   #3
TorpX
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsotha View Post
That makes sense. But did the TDCs of the era take all that into account?
I know the US TDC's did, and assume the KM's did as well, but as Hitman suggested, they were imperfect machines. O'Kane mentions in one of his books that they checked and calibrated the TDC between patrols and it would calculate the correct angle to 1/4 degree. He considered that sufficient, because the torpedoes were said to be able to hold course to within 1/2 degree.
TorpX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-13, 06:24 PM   #4
tsotha
Watch
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorpX View Post
I know the US TDC's did, and assume the KM's did as well, but as Hitman suggested, they were imperfect machines. O'Kane mentions in one of his books that they checked and calibrated the TDC between patrols and it would calculate the correct angle to 1/4 degree. He considered that sufficient, because the torpedoes were said to be able to hold course to within 1/2 degree.
Hmmm. 1/2 degree is about 17 meters at 2km. Seems effective enough given the length of the targets.
tsotha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-13, 09:43 PM   #5
TorpX
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
Default

Yes, in ordinary circumstances that would be more than enough. If a fast moving target was closing at a 10 or 15 degree track, it could be tricky, though.
TorpX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.