Republican Senate hopeful Richard Mourdock in rape row

soopaman2 · 10-27-12, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yubba

Maybe this storm is a good thing for you undecided folk it will show you what the next 4 years of Obama will be like when we go over the cliff.

Soop can play this game too!

So Romney hires all his friends to "so called" clean up. Yet cover real home owners in more red tape than they can manage alone. To the point they need a lawyer to litigate? Kinda like Dick and his Halliburton, I wonder how much they got to kill brownskins.... How much will I have to spend for aid, do I have enough? I doubt it, Romney is too rich to understand my plight. Yeah, I can point my finger to the "R's" too.

Yubba, have you ever been in a federal disaster area before? I doubt it, living in inland hicksville usa.'

A merciful tornado to trash your trailor would change your opinion.

I am sorry, but politicizing a (natural) national disaster is uncouth, and I am ashamed more are not trashing you for it. I am disgusted by most of this board ATM.

Maybe if it was your house floating off the foundation....
Typical republican, use fear to invoke feelings, rather than outright actions, spare me....

Sorry, I did what I critisized Yubba for, I made it partisan, I admit it. I am sorry.Points I made still stand though.

Takeda Shingen · 10-27-12, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2

Yubba, have you ever been in a federal disaster area before?

I think you could classify just about all of his threads as one.

yubba · 10-27-12, 04:12 PM

[QUOTE=soopaman2;1953392]Soop can play this game too!

Yubba, have you ever been in a federal disaster area before? I doubt it, living in inland hicksville usa.'
Yeah Merritt Island is a little bit inland from Cape Canaveral I lived here for twenty some odd years, in 04 I rode every hurricane out here,, I rode hurricane Charlie out in the cab of a semi,,after that I worked for a roofing supply company and yes most of the east coast of florida was a disaster area blue tarps as far as the eye could see,,, so you're going to get a wind storm,, when you ride a cat 2 hurricane out come talk to me. and yes my thread are disaster areas because libs can't understand freedom. oh that reminds me time to update Progressive Liberalism mental disorder thread.

Buddahaid · 10-27-12, 04:20 PM

Too funny.
http://www.bing.com/Dictionary/searc...ef&FORM=DTPDIA

http://www.bing.com/Dictionary/searc...=&qs=n&form=QB

Tchocky · 10-27-12, 05:25 PM

It's fairly easy to see what Mourdock was trying to say. It's pretty basic Christian/Pro-Life rote - life begins at conception and God has a hand in most things.

Anyone who honestly thought he meant that God intended rape needs to have their head examined.
Anyone using that interpretation against him politically needs to have their soul examined.
Anyone not using it against him should not be working in politics.

Christ, I'm depressed.

Gerald · 10-28-12, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tchocky

It's fairly easy to see what Mourdock was trying to say. It's pretty basic Christian/Pro-Life rote - life begins at conception and God has a hand in most things.

Anyone who honestly thought he meant that God intended rape needs to have their head examined.
Anyone using that interpretation against him politically needs to have their soul examined.
Anyone not using it against him should not be working in politics.

Christ, I'm depressed.

But you are well educated.

10-28-12, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tchocky

It's fairly easy to see what Mourdock was trying to say. It's pretty basic Christian/Pro-Life rote - life begins at conception and God has a hand in most things.

Anyone who honestly thought he meant that God intended rape needs to have their head examined.
Anyone using that interpretation against him politically needs to have their soul examined.
Anyone not using it against him should not be working in politics.

Christ, I'm depressed.

His statement highlights one fundamental flaw in his religious dogma. If his god has a hand in conception (or indeed "most things" as stated above), what does he not have a hand in? How can his god have responsibility for one (conception) without taking ownership for the other (rape)?

If mortals cannot know the mind of their god, how come religions all come with detailed but largely ambiguous instruction books (mostly dating from the Bronze Age)?

This clown (Mourdock) is just another American Taliban who's knowledge of biology and empathy for women in general is essentially non-existent.

Sailor Steve · 10-28-12, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Randomizer

How can his god have responsibility for one (conception) without taking ownership for the other (rape)?

I think just a little investigation would reveal that most believers feel that God created everything to be good, but free will allows men to be evil. Thus it is very easy for God to create conception and Man to create rape.

I understand your disagreement and even your hostility, but your own bias and prejudice are also showing. Do we really need to have this hostile argument again?

Buddahaid · 10-28-12, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

I think just a little investigation would reveal that most believers feel that God created everything to be good, but free will allows men to be evil. Thus it is very easy for God to create conception and Man to create rape.

I understand your disagreement and even your hostility, but your own bias and prejudice are also showing. Do we really need to have this hostile argument again?

Yes but after the evil man's free will rape must He take part and allow the conception? Or is it that He doesn't have a hand in everything? Or is that conception meant to be and therefore the rape meant to be? This is the point where the devout usually sit back and say it's God's will and meaningful discussion ends.

u crank · 10-28-12, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Randomizer

His statement highlights one fundamental flaw in his religious dogma. If his god has a hand in conception (or indeed "most things" as stated above), what does he not have a hand in? How can his god have responsibility for one (conception) without taking ownership for the other (rape)?

The misinterpretation here is that God has a hand in conception. In other words, it was His will that it happened. Humans have free will, given to them by God. God does not interfere with that free will, right or wrong. God is not responsible for either the rape or the conception. One is a crime and the other is biology.

Quote:

This clown (Mourdock) is just another American Taliban who's knowledge of biology and empathy for women in general is essentially non-existent.

Can't disagree with that.

Buddahaid · 10-28-12, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u crank

The misinterpretation here is that God has a hand in conception. In other words, it was His will that it happened. Humans have free will, given to them by God. God does not interfere with that free will, right or wrong. God is not responsible for either the rape or the conception. One is a crime and the other is biology.

Can't disagree with that.

Merely biology seems to be a sticking point for creationists. There has been a soul created at the moment of conception no?

10-27-12, 04:20 PM	#4
Buddahaid Shark above Space Chicken Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 9,334 Downloads: 162 Uploads: 0	Too funny. http://www.bing.com/Dictionary/searc...ef&FORM=DTPDIA http://www.bing.com/Dictionary/searc...=&qs=n&form=QB __________________ "However vast the darkness, we must provide our own light." Stanley Kubrick "Tomorrow belongs to those who can hear it coming." David Bowie

10-27-12, 05:25 PM	#5
Tchocky Navy Seal Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,874 Downloads: 6 Uploads: 0	It's fairly easy to see what Mourdock was trying to say. It's pretty basic Christian/Pro-Life rote - life begins at conception and God has a hand in most things. Anyone who honestly thought he meant that God intended rape needs to have their head examined. Anyone using that interpretation against him politically needs to have their soul examined. Anyone not using it against him should not be working in politics. Christ, I'm depressed. __________________ [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-27-12, 04:12 PM	#3
yubba Admiral Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: in a neighborhood near you Posts: 2,478 Downloads: 293 Uploads: 2	[QUOTE=soopaman2;1953392]Soop can play this game too! Yubba, have you ever been in a federal disaster area before? I doubt it, living in inland hicksville usa.' Yeah Merritt Island is a little bit inland from Cape Canaveral I lived here for twenty some odd years, in 04 I rode every hurricane out here,, I rode hurricane Charlie out in the cab of a semi,,after that I worked for a roofing supply company and yes most of the east coast of florida was a disaster area blue tarps as far as the eye could see,,, so you're going to get a wind storm,, when you ride a cat 2 hurricane out come talk to me. and yes my thread are disaster areas because libs can't understand freedom. oh that reminds me time to update Progressive Liberalism mental disorder thread.