SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-12, 08:57 AM   #1
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

But again the 9th Amendment only applies to abuse by the Federal Government. If my place of work chooses to fire me for something I've said I can contest it in a civil lawsuit but there is no automatic protection, any more than I can hold a protest rally inside the local grocery store. The owners have rights too.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-12, 06:32 PM   #2
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,406
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Guillen had the right to say what he did.
The citizens of FL had the right to say what they did
The owners of the team had the right to do what they did

Florida is an "at will employment" state. There are only three exclusions in Florida's "at will employment" status. Florida statutes Title 31 state

Quote:
448.102***8195;Prohibitions.—An employer may not take any retaliatory personnel action against an employee because the employee has1)***8195;Disclosed, or threatened to disclose, to any appropriate governmental agency, under oath, in writing, an activity, policy, or practice of the employer that is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation. However, this subsection does not apply unless the employee has, in writing, brought the activity, policy, or practice to the attention of a supervisor or the employer and has afforded the employer a reasonable opportunity to correct the activity, policy, or practice.
(2)***8195;Provided information to, or testified before, any appropriate governmental agency, person, or entity conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry into an alleged violation of a law, rule, or regulation by the employer.
(3)***8195;Objected to, or refused to participate in, any activity, policy, or practice of the employer which is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation.
History.—s. 5, ch. 91-285.
Even though I disagree with the firing, it is legal.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-12, 06:53 PM   #3
Aramike
Ocean Warrior

Best of SUBSIM
Chairman
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 3,207
Downloads: 59
Uploads: 0
Default

Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from the consequences of said speech.
Aramike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-12, 07:06 PM   #4
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,406
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramike View Post
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from the consequences of said speech.
And that is a very important concept to remember.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-12, 04:01 PM   #5
JU_88
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,814
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
In America, everyone has the right to free speech.
Or do they Get with the times....


Maybe it should be:
"In America, everyone used to have the right to free speech."

Last edited by JU_88; 04-12-12 at 05:28 PM.
JU_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-12, 04:33 PM   #6
Catfish
Dipped Squirrel Operative
 
Catfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky
Posts: 17,813
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0


Default

Maybe a bit harsh to exactly "praise" Castro.

And maybe the Spanish weren't better before the US won the spanish-american war - but have Americans ever wondered how the US behaved in Cuba, before Fidel had his Putsch ?
It was the whorehouse of the Navy, all good old boys would wash their money there, and it was #1 drug selling place for the Mafia and playground for international espionage, a real playground - indirectly backed by the US government so e.g. the 'mob' would not concentrate on the US mainland. People are not happy under Fidel, but they sure also weren't before: "Rum and Coca Cola, both mother and daughter, workin' for the Yankee dollar"
What will they do with Guantanamo, after it belongs to the US again ? Still neutral territory for torture and illegal imprisonment ?

And this quote justifies what Russia did for decades. Speak out what you will, we will just put youin jail and torture you, but you can say what you want in our free country lol
Quote from Platapus:
"Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from the consequences of said speech."
Catfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-12, 08:13 PM   #7
mookiemookie
Navy Seal
 
mookiemookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramike View Post
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from the consequences of said speech.
End of thread. Game, set, match.

You are free to say stupid stuff, but then again, your boss is free to exercise their freedom of speech and tell you to pack it in and get out.
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.

Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.
mookiemookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-12, 12:10 AM   #8
Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

But that means in practice you DON'T have freedom of speech. Saying you have a certain freedom is USELESS w/o guaranteeing a certain degree of protection against the powers-that-be that might not like the way you employed said freedom, be it a government or a corporation.

And separating between government and corporation is dangerous b/c both are powers that be and their interests are often quite allied. Imagine government (being restricted from taking direct action) quietly promising benefits to corporations if only they cashiered (using their rights) any employee caught putting out anti-government messages. Good bye, freedom of speech.
Kazuaki Shimazaki II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-12, 01:30 AM   #9
Catfish
Dipped Squirrel Operative
 
Catfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky
Posts: 17,813
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0


Default

^This.

OT:
You can say what you want, but we will hear all of it :
http://presstv.com/detail/232475.html

"The facility of USD 2 billion is designed to “intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications including the contents of telephone calls, private e-mails, mobile phone text messages and Internet searches."

Or, to be blunt, your privacy is an idea of the past.
Catfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-12, 05:56 PM   #10
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,406
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

No, what it means is that the government can't make any laws infringing on your freedom of speech.

Try telling your wife that you have freedom of speech. ...
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.