![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Think it may be bugged in SH 4 though.I keep it turned off but tested it when making a night surface attack on convoy in early June 43(same patrol) and even at 4000M it did not detect enemy ships.Think that in an attempt to show how poor the metox was, its nerfed too much as my radar man never reports a contact even though the lines are dancing on the scope. Last edited by Bubblehead1980; 04-04-12 at 03:29 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 908
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Also, the METOX really was that bad. It was wholly unreliable. Another issue is that the METOX could only detect the older Allied radar. About the time METOX became common, the newer, higher frequency radar sets were being used in ships and planes and METOX could not detect them. There is no bug, other than what I mentioned. METOX just plain sucks. ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Well I think the bug is the watchmen does not report contacts(as I could see them on the scope myself) and they do not register on the map if map contacts are on.I don't mind it being "sucky" as per history but wish my radarman would report contacts when we have them as it would help set up firing solutions(manual targeting) on the large convoys.Wait, METOX was the RWR.The seetakt radar is what I am talking about, the RWR works fine mostly.Although, some planes and ships radars are not detected now, must have the new allied radar sets. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 908
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The FuMO 29 Seetakt was a failed experiment, as well. What made it different is that the array was directly mounted to the conning tower. However, its range was only 7km (which is shorter than visual range in good to unlimited visibility areas) and had a fixed arc of 60 degrees. I would hardly call something with a 300-degree baffle useful. About the only thing this would be good for is detecting navigational hazards in foggy ports.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Ah got ya.Always amazed me at how amazing the Germans were militarily speaking, they had real shortcomings in some areas that was key to victory. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 908
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If you compared the advancements versus shortcomings, the Germans pretty much started the war about a decade too early. Likewise, failure to accept feedback from the front lines and a clear underestimation in the Allied response really hamstrung the effort. As bad as the radar sets were, it was cracking the Enigma that really beat down the Kriegsmarine. It doesn't matter how spiffy a U-boat is if the targets are anywhere except where you are.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Mate
![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Buenos Aires, ARG
Posts: 51
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
There is a great article about the METOX in wikipedia, the beginnings, the research, the problems that came later... its very very well redacted and helps to understand all the context in wich it was developed..
The bad news is that its in spanish... but you can use google translator hahaha ![]() i will quote a testimony from the capt of the U-230, it appears on the article, but i will make my best effort to translate it to you ![]() ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|