![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
They attempted exactly what you suggest and failed totally, losing more boats than targets sunk to radar equipped aircraft, radio location and submarine ambushes. Acting as mobile minefields in defence of every potential island target would have been a desperate strategy, doomed to failure as finite resources required for other vital missions would have necessary and have drawn off the defensive boats. Once the US CVBG's sat over the horizon, there was no more Japanese air cover and the boats would have died, tied to a location they could not possibly defend against an alert, superior ASW force. The Japanese faced far more formidable problems than the U-Boats, the distances were vast, the air threat unbeatable and they had lost the technology war before firing a shot. Not even their uber-torpedoes could save the day. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ...somewhere in the swamps of Jersey.
Posts: 911
Downloads: 157
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Sure a more aggressive IJN submarine campaign would have hurt the US effort and caused more losses, but like the kamikazes, it would not have changed the final outcome- crushing defeat. Besides, as Yamamoto knew in 1941. There was no way that Japan could compete with the US once the American industrial base got rolling.
__________________
...I fought in many guises, many names, but always me. Patton
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Pacific Aces Dev Team
|
![]()
Of course it wasn't the fastest ... look at my signature
![]() http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Type_XVII_submarine
__________________
One day I will return to sea ... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|