Is the Tea Party Over?

[Osmium Steele]

Originally Posted by Vendor

"That is not news",it is something that will stand for you, there are reasons for this, which does not belong here, the BBC or any other on earth can be used to make a post, again, choose what you want to read, nothing could be easier."Yes, but you have yet to post news",your statement here, is not based on that I had to post news here on SubSim, there is a soul chosen decisions I have made before, and nothing that either Neal or someone else has said, there are no musts.

If I caught the gist of your post, you are saying that you can use whatever source you wish and you chose to use the NYT opinion page.

If that is your meaning, I absolutely agree.

Simply realize that they NYT Opinion page is not news. It is propaganda.

[Betonov]

Like Vendor's got anything to gain by forwarding ''propaganda''

And if the opinion would be from some rightist nutjob claiming the wall street protestors were national terrorist you would be sending Vendor packets of cherry schnaps

Send a letter to the author, not the vendor

[August]

Originally Posted by Betonov

And if the opinion would be from some rightist nutjob claiming the wall street protestors were national terrorist you would be sending Vendor packets of cherry schnaps

Says you.

[Betonov]

Originally Posted by August

Says you.

Says me and that's my opinion. And what are you going to do about it, write an opinion ??

[Osmium Steele]

Originally Posted by Betonov

Like Vendor's got anything to gain by forwarding ''propaganda''

<snip>

Send a letter to the author, not the vendor

The author, of the original post in this thread, was Vendor; and I do not question his motives, only the method.

If I were to routinely post opinion pieces from The Blaze, Breitbart, The Heritage Foundation blogs, etc. I would certainly not expect to be given a pass by the many members of this forum who may disagree with the posted opinions. (Not to mention I'd feel the need to take a hot shower afterward, despite what you may think)

As Vendor has stated, I believe, he retains the privilege to post as he wishes on this site, within the established rules.

He does not retain the privilege of being free from criticism from those who may disagree with his choice of source.

[August]

Originally Posted by Osmium Steele

The author, of the original post in this thread, was Vendor; and I do not question his motives, only the method.

If I were to routinely post opinion pieces from The Blaze, Breitbart, The Heritage Foundation blogs, etc. I would certainly not expect to be given a pass by the many members of this forum who may disagree with the posted opinions. (Not to mention I'd feel the need to take a hot shower afterward, despite what you may think)

As Vendor has stated, I believe, he retains the privilege to post as he wishes on this site, within the established rules.

He does not retain the privilege of being free from criticism from those who may disagree with his choice of source.

This ^

[Jimbuna]

Can we all move on please....no rule violations have taken place and views and opinions are being debated at an acceptable level.

TIA

[Betonov]

NEAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Change Vendors title to Subsim news and opinions man, that should keep some people happy Until Vendor makes a mistake and posts a weather forecast

And I'm off to the pub

So you resent people talking inaccurately about your country?

I see no resentment in the post, lots of ridicule though.

[Gerald]

Originally Posted by Osmium Steele

The author, of the original post in this thread, was Vendor; and I do not question his motives, only the method.

If I were to routinely post opinion pieces from The Blaze, Breitbart, The Heritage Foundation blogs, etc. I would certainly not expect to be given a pass by the many members of this forum who may disagree with the posted opinions. (Not to mention I'd feel the need to take a hot shower afterward, despite what you may think)

As Vendor has stated, I believe, he retains the privilege to post as he wishes on this site, within the established rules.

He does not retain the privilege of being free from criticism from those who may disagree with his choice of source.

I have never denied that take constructive criticism, and there is no one who has these privileges.

[Gerald]

Originally Posted by Osmium Steele

If I caught the gist of your post, you are saying that you can use whatever source you wish and you chose to use the NYT opinion page.

If that is your meaning, I absolutely agree.

Simply realize that they NYT Opinion page is not news. It is propaganda.

Listen, I'm fully aware that they any postings are just opinions, if I choose something from them, some think that they contain a lot of propaganda, and partly they doing it, that I agree, but also "easy news" contains an indirect propaganda, and you will understand now, what I have said about this.

[STEED]

"I'm back to tell it straight,baby".

[soopaman2]

But Paul Krugman says we should spend our way out of this!
Frank Rich is a shill for the government in general.
Maureen Dowd is a beautiful redhead, unmarried fiftysomething, man hating and women-centric...You connect the dots
Bruni is a moron outright. The fella that resigned was way better.

Kinda work in NYC, this paper is always sitting on a train seat.