![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Egypt
Posts: 840
Downloads: 132
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
But isnt that somewhat forgranted? I mean in real life, if ships were sunk in that area, Japs would divert all ships to another route?
__________________
x.com/lexatnews |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 857
Downloads: 87
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
Yeah you're probably right, I didn't say it was realistic
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Egypt
Posts: 840
Downloads: 132
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
But thanks for sharing your routine.
![]()
__________________
x.com/lexatnews |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
How I operate depends on the period of the war and the area, much as it was in RL.At the onset of the war through 42 I submerge during daylight with occasional periscope sweeps and use sonar to make contacts, if need to surface to close target I will.This follows early war doctrine.
Around Jan 43 or so I begin using night surface attacks at night(obviously) and still patrol submerged during daylight with surface patrols becoming more common as the year wears on.Mid 43 till the end I patrol on surface and dive only when have to, to avoid planes, attack etc. Exception to this would be that of RL when patroling close to shore or in Sagami Bay etc I run TMO with RSRD and when with SubPac I patrol the Japan-Mariannas-Truk lanes often in 43 and 44, Japan-Luzon, Formosa Straits often, sometimes hang around the Tokyo area if assigned.Late 43 into 44 Rabaul-Truk lanes are busy. When out of Australia I go where assigned but favorite areas are off Northern Luzonor just outside southern formosa straight.Coast of Indochina is pretty fruitful usually as well.October 44(do this from both commands) China coast is packed with convoys but shallow waters and enemy radar can make it challenging. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Posts: 938
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If you're bored and don't know where to go, just report your status to base and they will always find you somewhere to go.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Egypt
Posts: 840
Downloads: 132
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I will start practicing calling AOB. I dont want the plot methods anymore, since skippers used their eyes, well, I should too.. If I'm correct there was a periscope method to get the AOB and I wish if somebody lay it plain on the table.
__________________
x.com/lexatnews |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
|
![]() Quote:
I think eyeballing (calling AOB) and plot methods should be considered complementry; that is one assists the other. If you mean by plot methods, using map contact updates, I agree this is much easier. I know O'Kane used both his observations and info from the plot for his attacks. The plot could not eliminate the need for visual estimates of AOB, because the target was usually following a zig-zag course, and it was necessary to know the base course and be able to anticipate the next zig. If one had to rely only on stadimeter ranging and plot (without knowing AOB), a course change or zig would only become evident well after the target was into the new course. By the same token, using visual estimates alone, would leave one without a good overall view, masking errors in observation and making an effective approach or "end-around" much more difficult. In short, using both techniques together, minimizes the weaknesses of each. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|