SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-11, 12:29 PM   #1
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MH View Post
Sort of hard to believe that men actually landed on the moon.

(not in conspiracy theory sense)
Not too difficult when what most see as the best spacecraft in the world is a glorified glider.

Sad that the US is going to be out of the manned space business for a while but not sad to see the shuttle go.

The Soyuz: now that is a proper spacecraft, it could take you to the moon if you let it. Too bad Obama caned our version (Orion), he lost my vote when he did that.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 12:40 PM   #2
razark
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,731
Downloads: 393
Uploads: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
The Soyuz: now that is a proper spacecraft, it could take you to the moon if you let it.
Put a big enough fuel tank on it, and the shuttle could get to the moon. Neither one is going to be landing, though.

The shuttle was a craft designed to have certain capabilities, but never had a chance to develop most of those capabilities. Every spacecraft is built for a specific purpose. You can press it into other duties, but a custom designed craft is going to fit those roles better. The shuttle was designed as a general purpose spacecraft, which means it could do a lot of things half as well as any craft designed for those roles.
__________________
"Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!"
razark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 06:14 PM   #3
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,386
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Not too difficult when what most see as the best spacecraft in the world is a glorified glider.

Sad that the US is going to be out of the manned space business for a while but not sad to see the shuttle go.

The Soyuz: now that is a proper spacecraft, it could take you to the moon if you let it. Too bad Obama caned our version (Orion), he lost my vote when he did that.
But if Obama had plunked mega bucks in to the space program how many people would be on his butt for spending too much?

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.

Personally, knowing that no matter what his decision some will be pissed at him, I am glad he chose the less expensive decision.

When the economy recovers, we will be in a much better position to reengage in manned space travel.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 07:15 PM   #4
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
But if Obama had plunked mega bucks in to the space program how many people would be on his butt for spending too much?
Megabucks? How much do you think they spend on NASA? The percent of the federal budget set aside for NASA is about whopping .6%. Back in the 1970's NASA was taking its budget and returning double with derivative technologies.

Quote:
Personally, knowing that no matter what his decision some will be pissed at him, I am glad he chose the less expensive decision.

When the economy recovers, we will be in a much better position to reengage in manned space travel.
Cheap things turn out to be expensive.

Worse case scenario is that when we go back in space there are Chinamen up there picking our dudes off with rail guns.

More likely scenario is that the Chinese stake a claim on a few Near Earth Asteroids with trillion(s) dollar deposits of rare metals. Think there is a trade deficit now? Imagine what it will be like when China can get gold for making computer parts for 1/10th the price.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 07:20 PM   #5
Falkirion
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne, AUS
Posts: 1,043
Downloads: 34
Uploads: 0
Default

My birthday is going to be tinged with sadness this year. Atlantis is scheduled to fly for the last time on it.
Falkirion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 07:43 PM   #6
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Must have been a short show. Twenty-five seconds to the cloud deck.

Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 07:47 PM   #7
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,386
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Look on the bright side, we can let China pay for all the development costs and we can steal the technology from them for a change.

These days, my political attitude seems to revolve around the statement "we ain't got the money!"

I am a big space history buff, I love space technology and the exploration. But we ain't got the money to start some big expensive programs. Not saying that we will never have the money, but not just yet.

Also on the bright side, remember why we had a space race? Because there was someone to race. Remember how we got our butts handed to us at the start of the space race? Remember how that energized the entire nation? America does pretty well when first smacked down. We are pretty good at bouncing back

Maybe we need a good space opponent to get interest back in to it. Perhaps the Chinese would be a challenging opponent???
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 08:01 PM   #8
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post

Maybe we need a good space opponent to get interest back in to it. Perhaps the Chinese would be a challenging opponent???
Hard to say All recent reports of planned Chinese manned moon missions are really based on mistranslations, misunderstandings, and wishful thinking. Recent presentations by Chinese space officials make clear that they won't even begin to study a moon mission until after they've successfully built a space station, which is at least a decade away. The current pace of the Chinese program doesn't really point to a concerted effort to put a man on the moon anytime soon. And since we've already been there I'm not sure it'd get us that excited anyway.
__________________

--Mobilis in Mobili--
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 08:34 PM   #9
FIREWALL
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
Default

Instead of being so negitive we might want to think of partnering up with China in a joint Spacecraft.
__________________
RIP FIREWALL

I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???
FIREWALL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 08:39 PM   #10
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIREWALL View Post
Instead of being so negitive we might want to think of partnering up with China in a joint Spacecraft.
The potential for having our technology ripped off and intellectual property rights tramped on are too great, along with the political ramifications. I still remember the reaming the Clinton administration got in Congress over the Chinese acquiring some sensitive satellite technology in a joint venture.
__________________

--Mobilis in Mobili--
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-11, 08:42 PM   #11
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIREWALL View Post
Instead of being so negitive we might want to think of partnering up with China in a joint Spacecraft.
Since China's space program has a distinct military twist I doubt that is going to happen.


^If you can't tell that's slung under the belly of a Badger bomber. If it has PLAAF written anywhere on it, I don't trust it.

Not too long I suspect before our two X-37Bs make way for production run FQ-37Cs. At least the USAF is keeping up with space developments.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-11, 04:52 AM   #12
papa_smurf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: High Peak, Derbyshire
Posts: 2,851
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIREWALL View Post
Instead of being so negitive we might want to think of partnering up with China in a joint Spacecraft.
ESA and NASA are looking at potentially working together to turn the ATV supply ship into a crew transport ship.
__________________

papa_smurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.