SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-11, 03:42 PM   #1
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,687
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Technological quality more and more pushes back the need for human quality in war tech. Like it or not. Who can fire the missiles of higher reach and better sensors first, usually wins. Modern infrared A-A missiles are almost impossible to be intentionally evaded, for radar missiles he who shoots first forces the other into the defensive. While force multipliers like intel and AWACS are a factor, missile's legs obviously is a factor, too.

Modern Russian missiles have very long legs that outrun Western missiles.

Better technology can compensate numerical inferiority to a certain degree - and not beyond.

America never has confronted top modern Russian equipment and top trained Russian experts in combination. Beating less trained personnel of third world armies with B- and C-grade equipement of export quality, does not really tell you the ultimate truth about how it would end with the real enemy in place.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-11, 03:52 PM   #2
Jaguar
Officer
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The Pampas
Posts: 239
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
Modern Russian missiles have very long legs that outrun Western missiles.
This because russian doctrine, inherited from USSR times, calls for a huge SAM umbrella while NATO doctrine was centered in airplanes to achieve air superiority.

Quote:
Better technology can compensate numerical inferiority to a certain degree - and not beyond.
Quantity has a quality all of its own.

Quote:
America never has confronted top modern Russian equipment and top trained Russian experts in combination. Beating less trained personnel of third world armies with B- and C-grade equipement of export quality, does not really tell you the ultimate truth about how it would end with the real enemy in place.
Lets hope it stays this way....
Jaguar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-11, 04:07 PM   #3
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,687
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
This because russian doctrine, inherited from USSR times, calls for a huge SAM umbrella while NATO doctrine was centered in airplanes to achieve air superiority.
I thought about air-launched missiles and plane armament only anyway. If I were a pilot and wpuld have free choice, I am not sure that I would automatically pick for example AMRAAM´s for medium range missiles.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-11, 04:02 PM   #4
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
America never has confronted top modern Russian equipment and top trained Russian experts in combination.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.