SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-11, 11:57 AM   #1
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Indeed.

Oh, do note that some Assault Guns, such as the KV-2 and the Churchill AVRE, did have turrets. Though they still don't really count as tanks because of their low velocity guns and specialized design.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-11, 12:11 PM   #2
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
Oh, do note that some Assault Guns, such as the KV-2 and the Churchill AVRE, did have turrets. Though they still don't really count as tanks because of their low velocity guns and specialized design.
Exactly, its not the equipment so much as the role. Any armored vehicle with a DF heavy gun used to support Infantry could be considered an Assault Gun, turret or no turret.

BTW, the Churchill AVRE didn't technically have a gun during the war, its main weapon was a huge spigot mortar. It got a low velocity gun post war.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-11, 12:13 PM   #3
Freiwillige
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phx. Az
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
Default

Indeed and another example is the M-10 and M-18 hellcat of the us Army, they were tank destroyers but had turrets.
Freiwillige is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-11, 12:15 PM   #4
Growler
A long way from the sea
 
Growler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,913
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freiwillige View Post
Indeed and another example is the M-10 and M-18 hellcat of the us Army, they were tank destroyers but had turrets.
But because the US Army liked to keep its TD crews cold, wet, miserable, and unprotected, for some absurd reason, they never finished the turret roof, which made these vehicles' crews especially vulnerable to tree-burst artillery and even small arms fire.
__________________
At Fiddler’s Green, where seamen true
When here they’ve done their duty
The bowl of grog shall still renew
And pledge to love and beauty.
Growler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-11, 12:30 PM   #5
Freiwillige
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phx. Az
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Growler View Post
But because the US Army liked to keep its TD crews cold, wet, miserable, and unprotected, for some absurd reason, they never finished the turret roof, which made these vehicles' crews especially vulnerable to tree-burst artillery and even small arms fire.
Weight savings I assume. They were designed to shoot and scoot! Low armor and high speed. Although during Korea they added metal flaps that could be folded over the opening to protect from debris.

Back to the Stug video. That thing once hosed off looks like it went into the bog yesterday! I cannot believe how well preserved it is!!!
Freiwillige is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-11, 12:47 PM   #6
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,257
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Nice find.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-11, 12:56 PM   #7
UnderseaLcpl
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I have a somewhat-related question to ask about the StuG for our German-speaking members. How do you pronounce StuG?

I only ask because I've been having a debate over the pronunciation with my father for years. He insists it is pronounced as per English phonetics. I insist that it is a contraction of the word Sturmgeschutz and should be pronounced as "Stoog" - "not "stooge", mind you, that's a hard "G".
__________________

I stole this sig from Task Force
UnderseaLcpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-11, 12:13 PM   #8
Growler
A long way from the sea
 
Growler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,913
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
Indeed.

Oh, do note that some Assault Guns, such as the KV-2 and the Churchill AVRE, did have turrets. Though they still don't really count as tanks because of their low velocity guns and specialized design.
That has a lot to do with the designation - a low-velocity primary armament almost immediately defines the vehicle's role as indirect-fire capable infantry support. AT Guns, TDs, and tanks are direct-fire weapons (not saying they can't be used for indirect fire, but that's not their designed intent.)

Assault guns (esp. the short-barrel 75s) can fire both direct and indirect missions using the same primary weapon with little to no change in operation.
__________________
At Fiddler’s Green, where seamen true
When here they’ve done their duty
The bowl of grog shall still renew
And pledge to love and beauty.
Growler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.