SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-11, 09:39 PM   #1
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Makes me feel even more sorry for the residents of Pyongyang, what goes up must surely come down again...

Besides, I wonder how many of those guns would fire and how many would jam. Still, maybe put a stand-off missile on the Vimy then.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-11, 09:41 PM   #2
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
Makes me feel even more sorry for the residents of Pyongyang, what goes up must surely come down again...

Besides, I wonder how many of those guns would fire and how many would jam. Still, maybe put a stand-off missile on the Vimy then.
You would also have to wonder about how much functional ordnance they actually have as well.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-11, 09:45 PM   #3
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Lets consider what the horn section can do to the string section. Or, lets consider the worst case.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-11, 09:48 PM   #4
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Or we can just speculate. After all, unless you work in the intelligence community, you don't really know. And if you do work in the intelligence community, you probably shouldn't be yaking about it here.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-11, 09:56 PM   #5
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen View Post
You would also have to wonder about how much functional ordnance they actually have as well.
Based on the the Yeonpyeong attack ~1/5 were duds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen View Post
Or we can just speculate. After all, unless you work in the intelligence community, you don't really know. And if you do work in the intelligence community, you probably shouldn't be yaking about it here.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-11, 10:01 PM   #6
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

I get what you're saying TLAM, but I've always thought North Korea as kind of a paper tiger. Sure, they've got soldiers and hardware, but with dubious training and in dubious states of repair. They're also so diplomatically isolated that if they went to war with anyone, they wouldn't be getting any help; military or otherwise. They're not like, say, an Iran who actually has buddies in the world. True, they have China, but the Chinese seem more embarassed by their association than anything at this point, and appear to do everything to distance themselves from Kim and his regime.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-11, 10:01 PM   #7
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

I would cosider all tests successful and work backward. Not the orherway.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.