SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-11, 02:53 PM   #1
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freiwillige View Post
The charges are laughable and would hardly constitute rape in my opinion
Wow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by frau kaleun View Post
Where the law defines rape as "sex without consent," initiating sexual intercourse with a partner who is unconscious and therefore cannot have consented to it is rape, the end.
This.

Note that even if the woman consented AFTER the act started, the act of starting without consent was in itself rape. Intent matters.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-11, 03:18 PM   #2
Freiwillige
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phx. Az
Posts: 1,458
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
Default

Now do not misunderstand me, Rape is a horrific crime that should be punished to the fullest extent of the law and then some. The Issue as I understand isn't one of consensual sex but over the issue of the usage of a condom.

So before I get hung on my statement one needs to understand that one judge already threw it out only to have it reinstated by another.

It was clear by her statement that she wasn't offended they were having intercourse but was offended that he did not use a condom the second time.

She allowed the intercourse to continue with the statement "You batter not have aids".........So STD concern is the context of the issue not sexual intercourse. That is how I read into it and just my opinion.
Freiwillige is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-11, 04:02 PM   #3
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freiwillige View Post
Now do not misunderstand me, Rape is a horrific crime that should be punished to the fullest extent of the law and then some. The Issue as I understand isn't one of consensual sex but over the issue of the usage of a condom.

So before I get hung on my statement one needs to understand that one judge already threw it out only to have it reinstated by another.

It was clear by her statement that she wasn't offended they were having intercourse but was offended that he did not use a condom the second time.

She allowed the intercourse to continue with the statement "You batter not have aids".........So STD concern is the context of the issue not sexual intercourse. That is how I read into it and just my opinion.
My bad, I read frau's reply, but not the OP link.

You're right.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.