![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that there is no way that anyone is going to make this happen, let alone the broke-ass British, in 5 years.
The problem with adaptive camoflauge is that it is both heavy and remarkably useless when it comes to absorbing fire. AFVs might be able to mount it in two decades or so, at great cost, but an infantryman wouldn't even be able to carry the power source effectively, nor would he want to. Infantry are terribly difficult to hit under even the best circumstances, which is why we rely on things like thermal imaging, artillery, air strikes, and automatic weapons, any of which would render adaptive camoflauge useless. I hate to be a pessimist, but this just isn't going to happen.
__________________
![]() I stole this sig from Task Force ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Hemisphere, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 585
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Posts: 785
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Yes we're broke. I believe things were even worse for us when we came up with a couple of war winners you might not have heard of.... Radar ? Colosuss ? Both pretty far fetched and impossible at the time ? Innovation does not come out your pocket. Lots of other things come out your pocket, but that might take us off topic to a dark place best not discussed or thought of.
__________________
![]() Sir Humphey Appleby, GCB, KBE, MVO and MA. Britain's Greatest Orator, well bar that Churchill fellow.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yep, but I hope you didn't take offense at my saying so. I enjoy the occasional jibe at Her Majesty's distinguished subjects from time to time. I think it's an American thing.
Quote:
And besides, the British did invent the Americans, and we're forever winning wars for them ![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
![]() I stole this sig from Task Force ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Posts: 785
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Offense?
None taken at all. Couldn't resist a chance to state the obvious. Seriously though it's a promising avenue of research. No doubt it will have it's limitations and there will be countermeasures that will defeat the teschnology if it comes to fruition. But if it gives an edge against some oponents some of the time then surely it will be worth while. Also on the plus side, the UK will surely share this technology with the colonial cousins.
__________________
![]() Sir Humphey Appleby, GCB, KBE, MVO and MA. Britain's Greatest Orator, well bar that Churchill fellow.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
SUBSIM Newsman
|
If the cousins are lucky, they may be having to share the cake,
![]()
__________________
Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood. Marie Curie ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Frogman
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 296
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
In the tradition of Chobham armour, self-sealing fuel tanks, the Whittle jet engine, plastic explosives, mirror landing sight, the gyro gunsight, GEE, angled flight deck, cavity magnetron, proximity fuse, steam catapult, flexible coupling and rafting for nuclear subs, Frisch-Peierls Memorandum, sub propulsors, etc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|