SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-10, 03:55 PM   #1
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,783
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen View Post
Entering obligatory Airbus v. Boeing flamewar in 3....2.....1......
Seeing the Airbus' engine smoking, I think Boeing started early.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is online   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-10, 06:18 PM   #2
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
Seeing the Airbus' engine smoking, I think Boeing started early.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-10, 06:32 PM   #3
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,428
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

That is one big aircraft. Kudos to the pilots!
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-10, 05:51 AM   #4
papa_smurf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: High Peak, Derbyshire
Posts: 2,851
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Heres a video taken by a passenger onboard of the damage:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11692478

Something went seriously went wrong with the engine containment, as aircraft engines are supposed to contain any explosion to prevent any damage to the rest of the aircraft.
__________________

papa_smurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-10, 08:25 AM   #5
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

By the way, one detail that I'm really wondering about: engine 2 blew, but after landing apparently engine 1 could not be shut down (and you can see this in pictures of it being blasted with water to shut it off). What sort of damage would this indicate?
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-10, 08:48 AM   #6
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,320
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papa_smurf View Post
Heres a video taken by a passenger onboard of the damage:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11692478

Something went seriously went wrong with the engine containment, as aircraft engines are supposed to contain any explosion to prevent any damage to the rest of the aircraft.
The hole in the wing was 'gradually expanding'
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-10, 08:56 AM   #7
MH
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,184
Downloads: 248
Uploads: 0
Default

I think 747 had a problem with engines falling off when it was totaly new plane.
MH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-10, 09:32 AM   #8
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,783
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Most carriers do not maintain a maintenance network as extensive as that of Lufthansa, for that reason several carriers send their machines to Lufthansa for certain key checks that need to be run on a regular basis.

Qantas without "u" has chosen for the RR engines, so any problem with the engine is not an issue of Airbus, but between Qantas and RR. Airbus neither designs nor supplies the engines, and also does not maintain them.

The European Aerial Traffic Adminsitration (or hoe they are called in English) has released a note saying that already several months ago they ahd send a warning to RR over the engines for the A380, calling them to do additional inspections on their design.

It seems to me that there is an issue with the very design of the RR engines for the A380 that amongst insiders is known since longer.

I wonder if now orders for the rivalling engine by Engine Alliance will rise. Emirates are using these, I think, and Air France. I assume for a plane with four en gines that capable to fly with even 2 engines only, thrust is not the factor deciding which engines are chosen by a carrier, but fuel consumption, noise, availability, and supply of spare parts, price, longevity, etc.

Engine Alliance is American (GE and Pratt&Whitney), Rolls Royce is British.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is online   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-10, 09:21 PM   #9
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
Still, it'll be good to have a flame-war which doesn't revolve around Obama or US politics for once, won't it?
Until somebody makes an indirect tie between the engine failure and the POTUS.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
Seeing the Airbus' engine smoking, I think Boeing started early.
I do admire your wit, Skybird.
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.