![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
CFP=Cold Front Passage. CFP is typically associated with a 180° change in wind. But in general gear up is the least drag configuration. See drag demonstration during multi-engine quals. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
The line I drew? That was his exact path near as I can tell.
He was at the same alitiude as other aircraft on that flight path I've seen, 1,000 feet or more. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
SUBSIM Newsman
|
Could very well be a temp, decrease or drop in the atmosphere,because you have not noticed some special things that happened,call the airport management center for data
__________________
Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood. Marie Curie ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Subsim Aviator
|
![]()
When i was flying large turbine powered aircraft there were a couple of things we could do to correct a poorly planned descent or a high approach.
one would be lowering the gear early... sometimes several miles out from the airport. this would increase the drag and allow the speed to decrease into flap operating range thereby allowing us to quickly configure the aircraft for a much steeper descent and lose altitude quickly. I would assume this would be the case in your scenario. another thing we could do would be to push the prop levers forward bringing them to their lowest pitch setting while placing the power levers at flight idle. this would also create an enormous amount of drag and quickly slow the aircraft. if the aircraft sounded louder than you are used to this may have been one of the techniques they were using. I have had to do these things numerous times either due to an ATC issued altitude restriction that required a last minute crash dive so to speak or due to traffic restricting our descent capabilities or simply because of poor planning on the approach etc. EDIT: if the gear were down the entire time you saw the aircraft it is another possibility - however remote - that the aircraft was a non-revenue maintenance ferry flight during which the landing gear were pinned down. though i doubt this.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Could be any number of things. The Dash 8 has a few landing gear issues, resolved by now, but a little extra care is not surprising.
The main gear suffered locking issues, perhaps the pilot was using the greater forward airspeed to lock the gear. Also it takes quite some time for the gear to extend fully on a Dash8/Q400 (I could be thinking of an ATR though, not entirely sure). Was it busy around the field? ATC may have given a speed restriction for sequencing or somesuch. Hard to know. Change in active runway could also mess up a pattern. (EDIT - for this section jsut read GR's post ![]()
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|