Muslim woman sues US Disney World...

[August]

Originally Posted by mookiemookie

The EEOC disagrees.

Screw the EEOC. We deal with them up here too and they are a bunch of unrealistic pains in the patootie.

Apparently they don't want us to ask for ethnic information from our students that the Feds require us to provide in order to get student loans.
And even though a criminal history will make it nearly impossible for a student to get a job in the Electronic Security field for example, they don't want us to do a criminal background check on our students, even though that information is provided online via the RI Attorney Generals office to anyone with internet access, which puts us in the position of taking 13 grand from a person to provide an education that they won't be able to use.

All necklaces" only because stating that they ban crucifix necklaces would have gotten them fire earlier on! It was to avoid a public row over banning the symbol in question. If I remember it correctly it had to do saomethign with the destinations (in Mulsim countries) this ariline used to fly to very often.

So when Sky gets called out for simply making up "facts" about news stories he decides to dig himself into a deeper hole.

The policy for jewelry the airline has is for all necklaces, all rings apart from wedding/engagement ones, plus earrings are requireed to be either plain studs or small hoops. It applies to all staff that deal with the public either on the ground or in the air.

The Quran says clearly that women should mantle themselves. That was because muhammad was pissed to see foreign men staring at women who crouched behind bushes to follow the call of nature

Bloody hell, not even the craziest fundamentalist nut from the backside of beyond can have views quite as wierd as Skys.

[FIREWALL]

It's all about the MONEY. Congrats to mookie for finding some facts before some of you made complete fools of yourselves.