Obama supports "Ground Zero Mosque" (of course he does)

By your definition zoning itself is a violation of the 10th, yet SCOTUS has already said it is not.

Aramike is still stuck.
Conditions on zoning have to be generally applicable, banning only mosques without banning all places of religious worship fail that so are unconstitutional on the basis that it is discriminating against a religion.
Its why his comparison with restrictions on strip joints is bogus as those conditions which apply to strip joints apply to all strip joints which means they pass the test of general application.

As for the memorials you mention, of course I would stand dead square against them, but in the case of Pearl Harbor, it's America, and if the local zoning commission approved it and it passed muster with the higher authorities, I would support it, on LEGAL grounds.

As for Pearl Harbour Steve I think you are missing something, in fact several things.
Funnily enough they are things which are the main basis for most of this website.
So what exactly is the legal status of the japanese boats in Hawaii and isn't the body responsible for these the same body that does the USS Arizona and USS Utah

My argument on freedom is that freedom ends where freedom is used to destroy freedom. This implies, in this context, that I reject the idea of unlimited freedom - with regard to this implication. See my exchange with Steve some days ago. I once again refer to Poppers tolerance paradoxon and freedom paradoxon as well, that I have quoted releatedly now.

Sky still doesn't realise that he is exactlty what was warned against