US nuclear reactor shielding.

antikristuseke · 08-09-10, 06:50 PM

Yes, we know how google works, thank you.

Gerald · 08-09-10, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by antikristuseke

Yes, we know how google works, thank you.

08-09-10, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by antikristuseke

Yes, we know how google works, thank you.

Yet Subsim doesn't work the same way. To the detriment of its owners.

Some folks may not have known this information. Please stop degrading me to make yourself feel better.

What is wrong with you folks? Some criticize for knowing too much, others for knowing too little. Time to re-evaluate your place in the world and allow others in the loop..

Platapus · 08-09-10, 07:08 PM

First of all, an introduction with a new thread would be in order. Your first post was just throwing out some facts with no context or explanation.

Second, you are providing an answer to a question no one has asked. Imagine how cluttered this forum would be if everyone just started copying random pieces of information in new threads.

Third, you referenced the guy from wikileaks but made no further explanation how that relates to what you posted.

Fourth, when someone brings all this to your attention, your response is to attack them, and by inference the rest of the board for no reason.

08-09-10, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus

First of all, an introduction with a new thread would be in order. Your first post was just throwing out some facts with no context or explanation.

Second, you are providing an answer to a question no one has asked. Imagine how cluttered this forum would be if everyone just started copying random pieces of information in new threads.

Third, you referenced the guy from wikileaks but made no further explanation how that relates to what you posted.

Fourth, when someone brings all this to your attention, your response is to attack them, and by inference the rest of the board for no reason.

Again more attacks. What is wrong with you people?

antikristuseke · 08-09-10, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus

First of all, an introduction with a new thread would be in order. Your first post was just throwing out some facts with no context or explanation.

Second, you are providing an answer to a question no one has asked. Imagine how cluttered this forum would be if everyone just started copying random pieces of information in new threads.

Third, you referenced the guy from wikileaks but made no further explanation how that relates to what you posted.

Fourth, when someone brings all this to your attention, your response is to attack them, and by inference the rest of the board for no reason.

Yes, but in his defense I'm a dick and probably deserve it.
That being said, he isn't really a good troll, because this isn't amusing. Lacks wit.

08-09-10, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by antikristuseke

Ye

s, but in his defense I'm a dick and probably deserve it.
That being said, he isn't really a good troll, because this isn't amusing. Lacks wit.

As was said to me....no one asked for this information.

08-09-10, 07:32 PM

Bump

Ducimus · 08-09-10, 07:34 PM

Question to those who'd know:

Is the info third man is posting "common knowledge", or is this technical classified info that's been leaked somehow and shouldn't be posted?

EDIT: If its leaked info, id suggest reporting the post to get it removed rather then bumping it.

08-09-10, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducimus

Question to those who'd know:

Is the info third man is posting "common knowledge", or is this technical classified info that's been leaked somehow and shouldn't be posted?

EDIT: If its leaked info, id suggest reporting the post to get it removed rather then bumping it.

I consider that a legit question. Something new. It is open knowledge, although some of my numbers were changed.

ETR3(SS) · 08-09-10, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducimus

Question to those who'd know:

Is the info third man is posting "common knowledge", or is this technical classified info that's been leaked somehow and shouldn't be posted?

EDIT: If its leaked info, id suggest reporting the post to get it removed rather then bumping it.

Well I'll say this, this doesn't exactly give me a warm fuzzy considering Naval Nuclear Propulsion Information is one of this countries most closely guarded secrets. My John Walker alarm is warming up.

08-09-10, 07:08 PM	#4
Platapus Fleet Admiral Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,381 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 0	First of all, an introduction with a new thread would be in order. Your first post was just throwing out some facts with no context or explanation. Second, you are providing an answer to a question no one has asked. Imagine how cluttered this forum would be if everyone just started copying random pieces of information in new threads. Third, you referenced the guy from wikileaks but made no further explanation how that relates to what you posted. Fourth, when someone brings all this to your attention, your response is to attack them, and by inference the rest of the board for no reason. __________________ abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

08-09-10, 06:50 PM	#1
antikristuseke Silent Hunter Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Estland Posts: 4,330 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 0	Yes, we know how google works, thank you.

08-09-10, 07:32 PM	#8
The Third Man Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	Bump

08-09-10, 07:34 PM	#9
Ducimus Rear Admiral Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,987 Downloads: 67 Uploads: 2	Question to those who'd know: Is the info third man is posting "common knowledge", or is this technical classified info that's been leaked somehow and shouldn't be posted? EDIT: If its leaked info, id suggest reporting the post to get it removed rather then bumping it.