NYC Mosque Gets the go!

The rest of my statement however remains

How can the rest of the statement remain when it is based on a false premise?
As was pointed out in the Spiegel article once you cut through the "outrage" she was calling for something in the media that Saxony journalists already have themselves as part of their own charter, and her other "contraversial" thing was about the preservation of a secular state.
So since she was argueing for integration which you want, and against a religious state which you don't want then how can your statement remain when she is in agreement with you and you are objecting to the very things you are calling for???????

Though its not as funny as Skys attempt to link her to people who link to groups who want completely different things and paint it as part of his united jihadi conspiracy theory.