SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-30-10, 05:30 PM   #1
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Section 2.


In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-10, 05:52 PM   #2
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
Section 2.


In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction.
Perhaps something happened, but the judge of record has no jurisdiction here. Only the SCOTUS is the court of record. when it comes to states being part of the proceedings. We saw this when GWB stole the election from Al Gore.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-10, 08:09 PM   #3
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,222
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
We saw this when GWB stole the election from Al Gore.
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-10, 08:16 PM   #4
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
'S okay. Some people see only the "facts" they want to see, and nothing else counts.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-10, 08:36 PM   #5
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,222
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
'S okay. Some people see only the "facts" they want to see, and nothing else counts.
Yeah and it's off topic anyways.
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-10, 08:25 PM   #6
The Third Man
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
Did not SCOTUS step in when the state was accused of a misdeed during the 2000 campaign? Same as AZ, accused for a missdeed. The lower courts have no jurisdiction here, if you believe in the constitution.

Section 2.


Quote:
In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-10, 08:34 PM   #7
CaptainHaplo
Silent Hunter
 
CaptainHaplo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,404
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

The Third Man - while constitutionally you are correct, since 1978 this matter has been specifically changed through an initial Congressional action and tacit approval of the Court itself.

While its in the last bit of the page - you may find this enlightening on the matter:

http://supreme.justia.com/constituti...bassadors.html
__________________
Good Hunting!

Captain Haplo
CaptainHaplo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-10, 08:37 PM   #8
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Third Man View Post
Did not SCOTUS step in when the state was accused of a misdeed during the 2000 campaign? Same as AZ, accused for a missdeed. The lower courts have no jurisdiction here, if you believe in the constitution.

Section 2.
1. When the Democrats demanded a recount, a recount was had. And another. And another. And another.

2. Finally, Florida's Attorney General said enough was enough. Whether you think that was right; whether you think it was politically motivated; that was part of her job and her prerogative.

3. The Gore camp went to the Florida State Supreme Court and they overturned her decision.

4. The Bush Camp then went to the US Supreme Court and they in turn overturned the Florida Court's ruling.

The point is that you can argue that any of those decisions was political or legitimate. What is downright silly is claiming that Bush "stole" the election. It is just as valid to argue that Bush was ahead, the Attorney General was correct in her action, and that Gore attempted to use the State Court to steal the election.

Unless you can actually show impropriety on the part of the Supreme Court, claiming "theft" shows a lack of understanding of how the system works.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-10, 08:47 PM   #9
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,222
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
1. When the Democrats demanded a recount, a recount was had. And another. And another. And another.

2. Finally, Florida's Attorney General said enough was enough. Whether you think that was right; whether you think it was politically motivated; that was part of her job and her prerogative.

3. The Gore camp went to the Florida State Supreme Court and they overturned her decision.

4. The Bush Camp then went to the US Supreme Court and they in turn overturned the Florida Court's ruling.

The point is that you can argue that any of those decisions was political or legitimate. What is downright silly is claiming that Bush "stole" the election. It is just as valid to argue that Bush was ahead, the Attorney General was correct in her action, and that Gore attempted to use the State Court to steal the election.

Unless you can actually show impropriety on the part of the Supreme Court, claiming "theft" shows a lack of understanding of how the system works.
This ^
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.