SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-13-10, 06:03 AM   #29
Castout
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl View Post
That has been the case since the advent of gunpowder weapons. That's precisely why they develop things like slat armor, spaced armor, ERA, and skirt armor. They offer additional protection against low-velocity weapons that are specifically designed to penetrate armor.

I think you may be under the impression that there is some sort of armor that protects against all projectiles. That simply isn't the case. Even the most modern MBT in the world, the M1a2 Abrams, has a cage-armor turret bustle intended to deform armor-piercing projectiles before they reach the Cellular Amuunition Storage. The is no armor of proof in the modern world. Anti-tank missiles and projectiles have seen to that. There is only a combination of firepower, protection and mobility.
Yea I'm aware of the turret rack bustle in M1 tanks but that looks good on the tank while slat armor well . . .

Actually chobham protects against all just that tandem HEAT warheads pose great risk because the ceramics is only so thick.

ERA looks great on tank because they are properly put on the tanks surfaces.

I know I'm complaining about a tank's aesthetic aspect when given slat armor and it's ridiculous but I'm a ridiculous man

ERA, spaced armor, angled armor, and skirt armor as well as chobham were all born from tank designers and incorporated well into the inherent design while slat armors were never meant to protect MBTs as far as I knowand was only added as an ad-hoc solution.

But I never meant to argue, just saying that I hate slat armors on MBTs though I accept the reasoning behind them and I believe it's fairly easy to defeat the slat armors it just needs a preceding explosive to open the way for the the real warhead to pass through. With a little innovation this could be added to AT weapon system and or warhead. It would just make anti tank weapons a little heavier.
__________________

Last edited by Castout; 06-13-10 at 06:14 AM.
Castout is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.