Major bugs in GWX 3.0

[flakmonkey]

Only port i could think of that even came close to whart you typed was southampton, just checked it out, no crashes or problems of any kind. In fact its a port in name only, there are no 3d docks or ships present.

If this is the port you were referring to i can see no reason for a ctd, although there did appear to be quite a lot of land units on the shore so perhaps if you have low system ram <1Gb this could cause issues loading all those building/tree models.

[MidnightTempest]

Originally Posted by flakmonkey

Only port i could think of that even came close to whart you typed was southampton, just checked it out, no crashes or problems of any kind. In fact its a port in name only, there are no 3d docks or ships present.

If this is the port you were referring to i can see no reason for a ctd, although there did appear to be quite a lot of land units on the shore so perhaps if you have low system ram <1Gb this could cause issues loading all those building/tree models.

Nope.

My specs are:

Vista 64 bit
Intel Quad Core 2.33 GHZ
4G RAM

My graphics card is a bit outdated, GeForce 9500 GS, but for a 2005 game it's more than adequate.

So I don't think the crash is caused by my system.

[Weiss Pinguin]

lol this is fun

[Sailor Steve]

Adding to the Prien discussion, the mission was planned by Doenitz himself after much study of aerial photographs and much planning. It really was a one-time event.