![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
AAW for the allies ships are not that good in DWX.
But you don't get to play an AEGIS cruiser in DW afterall so why bother much? I'm sure the upcoming patch will try to fix that. DW is about sub and ASW it's not meant to be played as a task force simulation. Ha ha. Try fleet command for that. DW is really about playing sub and hunting for sub basically. That's the very reason they don't provide anything larger than FFG and the helo and P3 asides from the subs. DW predecessor SC was even solely about sub and there was no surface and air ASW playable.
__________________
Last edited by Castout; 11-20-09 at 09:42 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 382
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yeah but what about scenarios involving SSGN against Task group.
You need that kind of umbrella (even though you are not controlling them) ASW means that you need to defend against AAW. If you cannot then you miss the boat... We are talking an ASW simulation in a modern warfare. But I want to say many thanks to the developer of RA! Well done. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
Sure take the 688i launch Tomahawk anti ship missiles at Russian Task force lol you can see how effective their AAW is.
![]() I don't get it too when they numb down US forces AAW
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The problem of AA screen for allied units is certainly there and has to be corrected in the next iteration. Just because you don't get to play an Arleigh Burke or Ticonderoga doesn't mean the AA screen of a task force has to be non existant. This is further compounded by the fact that RUSSIAN task forces have an AA screen worthy of this name.
So yes there is definitely an oversight or bias in the mod which has to be taken care of in the next version. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I'm going to say something controversial here. I think the reason why the US units AAW is dumbed down is because the mod is made by Russian modders.
I've been around a few Russian language forums that discuss military matters and the conclusion I have come to is that they do not believe the US systems to be superior to their own. However you will find that in the English speaking world we have strategypage which is almost as bad. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Take for instance the subrocs, in DWX they are quite inoffensive. You can't base your strategy on launching subrocs and bet on sinking a sub (not only because you have to be precise, but also because the damage is very small compared to torpedos). Your primary ASW weapon is the torpedo, and then as a last resort tactics subrocs. As it should be. Xabbarus, believe me I have had experience with Alfa Tau over more than one year and I can tell you that each game on the russian side is always reduced to launching several subrocs and waiting for the hit because 1 asroc hit = 100% damage even to enormous subs. AT is impossibly imbalanced, much much worse than DWX ever was. Each mission (and I'm talking about missions with 10 players on average) is always reduced to an subroc fest. This is no way to play a game, the players not once launched torpedos because the subrocs are a god weapon in AT. Now, since the modders are russian they use russian sources. For instance, in the case of the Alfa eveyone was shouting that it should have had an operating depth of 800 meters or so, just because US estimates said so. Estimates can be + or -, and in Norman Polmar's Cold War Submarines, many times american sources said that they overestimated russian capabilities making them appear more deadly than they actually were. I think maybe the same thing happens from the russian side. Back to the Alfa, the modders sent me a russian pubblication (a book published in russia and entirely devoted to the Alfa (a pity it is not translated in english ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I know all about the Alfa.
I was just saying my opinion as one country set usually over or underestimates another countries capabilities. . I think I will wait until a later build and keep an eye on the discussion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Goldorak can you tell me the name of the Alfa book the Russian guys gave you.
I might get my inlaws to find it. Cheers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
In stock SC and DW, the Russian AAW is superior to US, including AEGIS ships.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
Oh really??
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|