![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
FFS goldorak it is nothing to do with moral standing it is to do whether it is worth it. I still read the DW forums and it seems people are still having problems with it.
I understand that due to underlying code ships such as the Udaloy are essentially an OHP. That and it seems issues with the AI. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
In any case, there are over 30 playable units, if the Udaloy is not to your taste, try the diesel electrics, or the Virginia, or Sturgeons, or the Typhoons. The Helix is nothing to sneer at, as the ASW Tupolev. The database has had a complete rehaul, and in mission design you can use objects that just aren't there in Lwami. For instance doing a recue mission of sub with an emergency beacon. Even from a weapons perspective, the amount of programmability in the settings blows out of the water Lwami and Alfa Tau. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
I second Goldorak. DWX is the mod to go after
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 382
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Talking about those patches, would it be possible to know which ones are needed and where to find those ( I just want to make sure I will take the right ones).
What about AEGIS ships in RA. I heard it is pretty bad. In the stock and LWAMI they are not so agressive (I think they make them better actually but I am not sure (salvo..). Hopefully it is not that bad in RA. I mean subs are not everything....ha ha |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
AAW for the allies ships are not that good in DWX.
But you don't get to play an AEGIS cruiser in DW afterall so why bother much? I'm sure the upcoming patch will try to fix that. DW is about sub and ASW it's not meant to be played as a task force simulation. Ha ha. Try fleet command for that. DW is really about playing sub and hunting for sub basically. That's the very reason they don't provide anything larger than FFG and the helo and P3 asides from the subs. DW predecessor SC was even solely about sub and there was no surface and air ASW playable.
__________________
Last edited by Castout; 11-20-09 at 09:42 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 382
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yeah but what about scenarios involving SSGN against Task group.
You need that kind of umbrella (even though you are not controlling them) ASW means that you need to defend against AAW. If you cannot then you miss the boat... We are talking an ASW simulation in a modern warfare. But I want to say many thanks to the developer of RA! Well done. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
![]()
Sure take the 688i launch Tomahawk anti ship missiles at Russian Task force lol you can see how effective their AAW is.
![]() I don't get it too when they numb down US forces AAW
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|