ying and yang

[Fr8monkey]

You just demonstated the conservitive moral standard... name calling and flaming the poster or speaker.

[Aramike]

Originally Posted by Fr8monkey

You just demonstated the conservitive moral standard... name calling and flaming the poster or speaker.

Nice try at dodging the points.

By the way, many would say the name-calling would be the liberal moral standard. Funny how it's wrong only when it pertains to your side. That's just more proof that liberal morality isn't morality at all...

...and that's coming from someone who's not conservative. Hah.

Besides, I didn't call anyone any names. If you interpretted my post as such, then you are merely assigning "names" to yourself, which would seem to indicate a "guilty" conscious.

Yet, if you could refute my points in the arena of ideas and logic, I suspect that you would have. Instead, you attempted to play yourself as a victim. Kudos. You almost won the Nobel Peace Prize.

[Fr8monkey]

I haven't dodged any points due to the fact you haven't made any. All you have done is say you actually agree with liberals on a great many things; yet you say the most stupid things about them. I don't have a guilty conscious, nor am I a 'victim'. far from it... I have not done anything wrong. That is the role of a person with no arguement, tear down someone personally and put them on the defensive. I don't play that. If you have nothing constructive to say, that shows.

Comments on "Nobel Peace Prize" and "liberal morality isn't morality at all", doesn't further the discussion; and just proves my point... you have nothing to bring to the discussion and I am not playing school yard politics with you or you kind. Good day.

[Aramike]

I haven't dodged any points due to the fact you haven't made any. All you have done is say you actually agree with liberals on a great many things; yet you say the most stupid things about them.

Too bad that, despite the available graphics, there isn't a "smilie" laughing hard enough to properly display my regard for this post.

So wait - your point is .... my points are "stupid" because they are "stupid"?

Dude, *I* could argue more effectively against my own points than that.

I don't have a guilty conscious, nor am I a 'victim'. far from it... I have not done anything wrong.

Of course not. Liberals never do anything wrong ... because nothing is wrong.

Okay, that's a cheap shot that I hardly believe ... but it's funny nonetheless.

That is the role of a person with no arguement, tear down someone personally and put them on the defensive. I don't play that. If you have nothing constructive to say, that shows.

Nice attempt with the "I know you are but what am I" rebuttal.

How is THIS not an "argument": "Do you know what is considered a "mandate"? Hint: it's not having a majority in anything - it's having a large majority of the ELECTORATE on your side."?

Or this: "The funny thing about morality is that, no matter who does what, your verdict on it will be the same. Yet, you flat out practically state that it is okay that your side does it because you believe the other side did.

Too bad your density prevails all the while suggesting that, through your own logic, it is okay that the other side does it, because your side clearly has no problem doing it. Logically, that means that the first side to do it isn't wrong in doing so.

Moral equivalency is a bitch, isn't it?"?

I guess it's not an "argument" if its something you disagree with, if you're a liberal.

Actually - nevermind that, I know liberals who are far more intellectual than that.

Comments on "Nobel Peace Prize" and "liberal morality isn't morality at all", doesn't further the discussion; and just proves my point... you have nothing to bring to the discussion and I am not playing school yard politics with you or you kind. Good day.

Wait, you got into the discuss without a valid point and are now exiting after having been refuted on your vapid "defend all liberals" posturing?

Indeed, good day.

[SteamWake]

Strange, I dont remember mentioning Obama.

Here is something a bit more local...

Originally Posted by Los Angeles Times

California appears poised to be first to ban power-guzzling big-screen TVs

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...,4908205.story

and since you bring Obama up...

LEAKED NETWORK MEMO REVEALS: Obama Controls Your Television Set
by John Nolte

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jj...elevision-set/