SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-09, 08:30 AM   #1
DigitalAura
Straight and True
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CANADA
Posts: 276
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Default

okay, wow... I didn't realize that the IJN mod was well underway!
Superb!

What can you all tell me about the IJN sub characteristics and other cool info... I love that they were told only to shoot warships! WOW. Did they have inferior/superior submarines? Torpedoes? Crew management? How did their ROE differ?
I imagine they were also plagued with poor resources, but I'm curious to know how these things compared.

I read that Calvert encountered many of these subs in his patrols, so I know there were plenty of 'em out there!
__________________

... ALL YOUR BEACH ARE BELONG TO US! ...
DigitalAura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-09, 07:55 PM   #2
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalAura View Post
What can you all tell me about the IJN sub characteristics and other cool info... I love that they were told only to shoot warships! WOW. Did they have inferior/superior submarines? Torpedoes? Crew management? How did their ROE differ?
I imagine they were also plagued with poor resources, but I'm curious to know how these things compared.
Japanese submarines employed the best torpedoes available during the Second World War. The Type 95 torpedo used pure oxygen to burn kerosene, instead of the compressed air and alcohol used in other nation's torpedoes. This gave them about three times the range of their Allied counterparts, and also reduced their wake, making them harder to notice and avoid.

However, compared to German submarines, Japan's larger boats were relatively easy to sight visually and with radar, were notoriously slow divers and sluggish to maneuver underwater. They were easy to track on sonar, and easy to hit. Japanese hulls weren't built as stoutly as those of German U-boats, and therefore could not dive as deeply nor survive such rough treatment. Also, they lacked radar until the first sets were installed in June 1944, and never had sets as good as the Allies possessed.

Given their good range, speed, and torpedoes, Japanese submarines achieved surprisingly little. This was because they were mainly employed against warships, which were fast, maneuverable, and well-defended when compared to merchant ships. Japanese naval doctrine was built around the concept of fighting a single decisive battle, as they had done at Tsushima 40 years earlier. They thought of their submarines as scouts, whose main role was to locate, shadow, and attrit Allied naval task forces. This approach gave a significant return in 1942 when they sank two fleet carriers, one cruiser, and a few destroyers and other warships, and also damaged two battleships, one fleet carrier (twice), and a cruiser. However, as Allied intelligence, technologies, methods, and numbers improved, the Japanese submarines were never again able to achieve this frequency of success.

Compounding these deficiencies, Japan was at war with the United States and the United Kingdom, two nations embroiled in a vast conflict with hundreds of more nimble U-Boats in the Atlantic, and hence two nations which poured lavish resources into anti-submarine warfare (ASW) research and development. The result was that the large, shallow diving Japanese subs took a beating when they faced these Atlantic-tested technological advantages in the Pacific.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikimcbee View Post
I think a limited 1942~43 campaign would be cool; IE Guadalcanal, Indian Ocean, US West coast.
A strike on Hollywood would be in order as well.

__________________

--Mobilis in Mobili--
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-09, 09:34 PM   #3
G2B
XO
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Guam, I think
Posts: 420
Downloads: 80
Uploads: 0
Default

They sank our Ferris Wheel


I was surprised and a little bummed that you could not play for the IJN, What a challenge that would be. Well worth the effort of putting it together.


Mission 1

7 December 1941

Slip into Pearl Harbour and deliver your torpedoes to any Capital Ships found, if you return we may give you a bigger boat.
G2B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-09, 10:49 PM   #4
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

One peculiar aspect of the Imperial Japanese Navy's submarine force was it's widespread use of aircraft launched from submarines. Other navies experimented with this, but only the Japanese pursued it with such energy. These float planes expanded the scouting range of the sub, and in theory allowed them to reconnoiter enemy ports. One was even used to carry out the only aerial bombing of the continental United States in World War Two near Brookings, Oregon in September 1942.

If the Japanese had ever turned their subs completely loose on shipping they would have been quite an advantage. Sure beats that tethered helicopter the Germans experimented with.
__________________

--Mobilis in Mobili--
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.