![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Downunder W.A. Sth.of the River
Posts: 174
Downloads: 36
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hi Captain Dave,
I have tried your settings but still get the SLI band on left of screen. If anyone knows how to get rid of it, it would be appreciated. Cheers
__________________
Run Silent Run Deep!!!! 01.NSM4 Classic/.RFB v.1.52.1024+Patches 02.RFB Radar HotFix/RSRDC_RFBv15_V420+Patch2 03.Sobers_Better_Rocks & Sand 04.Small_Nav_Tools_w_Chrono 05.Brit_MkVIII_US_Mk28_Torps 06.ROW Sound effects.v.9/Enviromental 5.0 O/S Win10 Pro 64-Bit/Intel 64xQuad Core CPU i7-4790+3.60 Ghz 32gig RAM nVidia GeForce GTX-1650 Ti Last edited by TopcatWA; 09-14-09 at 08:11 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Downunder W.A. Sth.of the River
Posts: 174
Downloads: 36
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
After a bit of fiddling around I eventually found how to get rid of it.
Very simple -at the top of the nVidia Control Panel screen you see a toolbar with '3D Settings' tab next to 'File, Edit and View', from the top left CP Window. Simply uncheck 'Show SLI Visial Indicators'. I often wonder why the most simplest of tasks are sometimes the most diffiicult to do Cheers ![]()
__________________
Run Silent Run Deep!!!! 01.NSM4 Classic/.RFB v.1.52.1024+Patches 02.RFB Radar HotFix/RSRDC_RFBv15_V420+Patch2 03.Sobers_Better_Rocks & Sand 04.Small_Nav_Tools_w_Chrono 05.Brit_MkVIII_US_Mk28_Torps 06.ROW Sound effects.v.9/Enviromental 5.0 O/S Win10 Pro 64-Bit/Intel 64xQuad Core CPU i7-4790+3.60 Ghz 32gig RAM nVidia GeForce GTX-1650 Ti |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Officer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Herriman, Utah
Posts: 247
Downloads: 398
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
I probably turned that OFF years ago and forgot all about it.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
its off topic but im upgrading my system and thinking about the video card (i have 1 8800gt 512mb) so can someone tell me why anyone "needs" more than one video card? nobody has every given me a good answer except to say "you just do" which to me only means its because everyone else does it.
skip the bench marks and impressing the boys bit but really, i've seen single card rigs work great and i dont see any benefit to running 2 or even 3 cards when one good medium to high end card is cheaper? i've never had a single card not do everything i could ask of it so whats the point having more cards other than lightening your wallet? what am i missing here? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
|
![]()
It's for the ultra-high crowd; Multi-GPU setups scale better at high resolutions. If you want to run everything at the max possible resolution, with all bells and whistles + Super Sampling AA & 16xAF... well, at least for the dual/triple high-end card setups; there are more sensible applications:
If you have a motherboard that provides the needed 32 PCI-E lanes, SLI/Crossfire doesn't have to be expensive. Just get 2 9800GTs, and your performance will come close to or equal a GTX275/285, for less money. The main drawback is the entry price; powerfull PSU for 2 cards and MB capable of full SLI/Crossfire (those 32 lanes). Your electric bill will suffer too. I agree though that 2x GTX 295 (or even 2x GTX285) is just silly, and very costly. Just a matter of preference. ![]()
__________________
Contritium praecedit superbia. Last edited by Arclight; 10-04-09 at 10:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
ok, so running 2 medium level cards brings you the performance of a high end card at less price but more power is used so your accessaries (psu, mobo, and case cooling) must all be beefed up.
now i understand it better, and yes thats what i was thinking about. when i see them get 2 or 3 of those high end cards. to me it was pointless for anyone to spend that much $ unless you get some great reward from it. i guess if your running a 36" or higher monitor then maybe it could make a difference but not something i think is good for the smaller desktop monitors. i could build 2 or maybe 3 high end computers with med-high end single video cards for what i see them spending on those multi high end video card rigs. sorry about getting off topic ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Downunder W.A. Sth.of the River
Posts: 174
Downloads: 36
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have another question on SLI setups.
Is anyone out there using the latest nHanser 2.5.1 (64-Bit) & getting good graphics & frame rate when playing SHIV? I have tried this with SLI enabled & cannot set it up with recommended settings from posts on this topic & cannot find in this version anything suitable. I've got the latest nVidia & framework drivers (64-Bit) but keep on getting compatabilty errors in the Windows/Systems32/NvApps.xml files - error in document (838, 47). When I do a search for this document, nothing comes up in relevant.xml file. Game runs ok using the nVidia Control panel settings with SLI enabled using Capt. Dave's settings without running nHanser but with it running on similar settings doesn't improve things especially the frame rate. Cheers
__________________
Run Silent Run Deep!!!! 01.NSM4 Classic/.RFB v.1.52.1024+Patches 02.RFB Radar HotFix/RSRDC_RFBv15_V420+Patch2 03.Sobers_Better_Rocks & Sand 04.Small_Nav_Tools_w_Chrono 05.Brit_MkVIII_US_Mk28_Torps 06.ROW Sound effects.v.9/Enviromental 5.0 O/S Win10 Pro 64-Bit/Intel 64xQuad Core CPU i7-4790+3.60 Ghz 32gig RAM nVidia GeForce GTX-1650 Ti |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
|
![]() ![]() It was working fine (nHancer 2.5.1 64b on Win7), but now it doesn't start, giving the error you described. Seems like some Windows-update screwed compatibility, could try rolling back. ![]()
__________________
Contritium praecedit superbia. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: at periscope depth
Posts: 1,204
Downloads: 97
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hi,
I come back with an old problem. Tried a long time the settings of the first post. But i always got a black screen with sh3 when i started it. I altere the aa setting to application and that worked. But then i got a jaggied horizon. Now i have tried aa supersampling 4x4 and that gives the solution for me for a correct horizion. But now i have a golfball sun. (flat) When i use shift page/up the sun glows but the jaggied horizon comes back. My specs Geforce 260gtx driver 195.62
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
|
![]()
Few thoughts:
-4x multisampling is the max that will work without side-effects -Be sure to disable "gamma correction" in nHancer/Nvidia CP. Make sure the profile is active if you make these changes in a game-specific profile! ![]()
__________________
Contritium praecedit superbia. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: at periscope depth
Posts: 1,204
Downloads: 97
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
My opion is that sh3 and sh4 has been thrown on one pile.
This sticky had to be seperatly made for sh3 / sh4. No, that doesn`t work, get the black screen again.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|