SH5 System Req's?

fallenyggdrasil · 08-25-09, 01:54 PM

Any chance to get SH V running on this system:

AMD Phenom 9650 quad-core 2,3 GHz,
ATI Radeon HD 3650 512 MB
4 GB RAM
Vista 64 Bit

?

sharkbit · 08-25-09, 02:08 PM

If Ubisoft listened to us and put everything that everyone wants in the game, only a HAL2000 will be able to run it.

"Open the torpedo doors HAL."
"I don't think I can do that Herr Kaleun."

Schultz · 08-25-09, 02:19 PM

My computer is :
Intel E8500 3.17 Ghz
4 G Ram
Asus 4870 512 Ram.
Hdd WD 640 G
Win xp x64

I think it will handle just fine and I believe all at max

Jimbuna · 08-25-09, 02:43 PM

Woah!....connect 4

Schultz · 08-25-09, 02:48 PM

Oh please excuse for that but I had some little problems with the net,it didn't load the page after I pressed submit so I pressed a few times.
I'm sorry 1 million times,can someone delete 3 of them,sometimes it happends to people

fallenyggdrasil · 08-25-09, 04:40 PM

you could just use the edit /delete button below your messages

Trool323 · 08-25-09, 04:41 PM

Ubisoft will only put out a product that the mass public has a chance at being able to play on their home pc. Otherwise no one will buy it because they won't be able to play it. Right now the average computer is a duel core with a gig of ram in it, with an onboard pc express graphic card. I suspect a system like this will be the minimum REQs. If you want the game to run like a champ you'll probably need a quad core with 2 gig..

think back when SH4 was released it used the last of the AGP 8x tech and it took a pentium 4 with 1 gig as a minimum req.. So you have to allmost double that for SH5 I would imagine. But the old sayin goes will just have to wait and C

Wintahs · 08-27-09, 07:18 AM

That's the budget standard, not a gamer's standard. I'm you'l be fine with 2GB RAM, a decent Dual Core and a 7600GT(As a minimum)

Jimbuna · 08-27-09, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by infernos

Oh please excuse for that but I had some little problems with the net,it didn't load the page after I pressed submit so I pressed a few times.
I'm sorry 1 million times,can someone delete 3 of them,sometimes it happends to people

Don't you go worrying.....a simple/genuine mistake.

Funny as hell though

FIREWALL · 09-04-09, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fallenyggdrasil

Any chance to get SH V running on this system:

AMD Phenom 9650 quad-core 2,3 GHz,
ATI Radeon HD 3650 512 MB
4 GB RAM
Vista 64 Bit

?

Did you ever bother to read the SH4 requirements.

Who ever sold you a computer should'a had their head examend.

Come on. Who do you think your kidding with that post.

fallenyggdrasil · 09-05-09, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FIREWALL

Did you ever bother to read the SH4 requirements.

Who ever sold you a computer should'a had their head examend.

Come on. Who do you think your kidding with that post.

I´m not kidding anyone with that post. Very sorry if I my question is that stupid....
Yes, I read the SH4 requirements:

recommended sys:
WinXP/VISTA
DirectX 9.0c
Pentium 4 or AMD Athlon, 3 GHz
2048 MB RAM
DirectX 9.0c Grafics with 256 MB RAM and Pixel Shader 2.0

but this doesn´t help me - Why do you think I am kidding?

09-05-09, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fallenyggdrasil

I´m not kidding anyone with that post. Very sorry if I my question is that stupid....
Yes, I read the SH4 requirements:

recommended sys:
WinXP/VISTA
DirectX 9.0c
Pentium 4 or AMD Athlon, 3 GHz
2048 MB RAM
DirectX 9.0c Grafics with 256 MB RAM and Pixel Shader 2.0

but this doesn´t help me - Why do you think I am kidding?

nothing to be sorry about so no worries but untill we actually see what the specs really are for sh5 we cant say for sure whats really good enough.

your specs are:
AMD Phenom 9650 quad-core 2,3 GHz,
ATI Radeon HD 3650 512 MB
4 GB RAM
Vista 64 Bit

so i would have to believe you are fine with that system but your video card is really weak compared to todays cards so that would be my only upgrade recommendation for you even though it might run sh5 ok just like it is.

maerean_m · 09-05-09, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEBSTER

your specs are:
AMD Phenom 9650 quad-core 2,3 GHz,
ATI Radeon HD 3650 512 MB
4 GB RAM
Vista 64 Bit

The video card (3650) is not that good. I believe it would struggle with maximum details in 1280*1024.
The rest is really good value.

Tarnsman · 09-06-09, 03:53 PM

The main thing Ive found in re performance and longevity in a system is the Front Side Bus. I got a 3.2mhz PIV running a 800fsb and it only cost me a few months and a few extra dollars over the 533mhz fsb. Im so glad I got it I cant tell you. My single core rig is still competitive after 3+ years,with Gpu upgrades.

A limited fsb will be a bottleneck on the cpu, ram, gpu everything. So next rig will be 1600mhz fsb for me.

JU_88 · 09-06-09, 04:07 PM

I still have a Core duo E8500 which isnt too bad, I really see no need for a quad core just yet.

Have 4GB Ram, but im on Win xp which can only handle 3GB :-/
Trouble is, I really really HATE Vista, it a horrible OS!
Im wating for Windows 7, and even then I'll set up a duel boot with XP on another partion or drive.
(while they patch up 7)

For graphics I have a 9800GT which is (lol) a rebagded 8800GT - they are the EXACT same card,
I knew this when I purchased it, but it was still rather rather Decpetive of Nvdia none the less.
Any way, Im thinking of upgrading to '200' Series card around Christmas.

08-25-09, 02:08 PM	#2
sharkbit The Old Man Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Denver, CO Posts: 1,529 Downloads: 334 Uploads: 0	If Ubisoft listened to us and put everything that everyone wants in the game, only a HAL2000 will be able to run it. "Open the torpedo doors HAL." "I don't think I can do that Herr Kaleun." __________________ “Prejudice is blind. There will always be someone who says you aren’t welcome at the table. Stop apologizing for who you are and using all your energy trying to change their minds. Yes, you will lose friends, maybe even family. But you will gain your self-respect. You will know your worth. Once you have that, nothing can stop you.”

08-25-09, 02:43 PM	#4
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 190,818 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	Woah!....connect 4 __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

09-06-09, 04:07 PM	#15
JU_88 Silent Hunter Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: UK Posts: 3,812 Downloads: 11 Uploads: 0	I still have a Core duo E8500 which isnt too bad, I really see no need for a quad core just yet. Have 4GB Ram, but im on Win xp which can only handle 3GB :-/ Trouble is, I really really HATE Vista, it a horrible OS! Im wating for Windows 7, and even then I'll set up a duel boot with XP on another partion or drive. (while they patch up 7) For graphics I have a 9800GT which is (lol) a rebagded 8800GT - they are the EXACT same card, I knew this when I purchased it, but it was still rather rather Decpetive of Nvdia none the less. Any way, Im thinking of upgrading to '200' Series card around Christmas. Last edited by JU_88; 09-06-09 at 04:24 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

08-25-09, 01:54 PM	#1
fallenyggdrasil Mate Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Duderstadt, Germany Posts: 53 Downloads: 9 Uploads: 0	Any chance to get SH V running on this system: AMD Phenom 9650 quad-core 2,3 GHz, ATI Radeon HD 3650 512 MB 4 GB RAM Vista 64 Bit ?

08-25-09, 02:19 PM	#3
Schultz Officer Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Bucharest - Romania Posts: 237 Downloads: 16 Uploads: 0	My computer is : Intel E8500 3.17 Ghz 4 G Ram Asus 4870 512 Ram. Hdd WD 640 G Win xp x64 I think it will handle just fine and I believe all at max

08-25-09, 02:48 PM	#5
Schultz Officer Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Bucharest - Romania Posts: 237 Downloads: 16 Uploads: 0	Oh please excuse for that but I had some little problems with the net,it didn't load the page after I pressed submit so I pressed a few times. I'm sorry 1 million times,can someone delete 3 of them,sometimes it happends to people

08-25-09, 04:40 PM	#6
fallenyggdrasil Mate Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Duderstadt, Germany Posts: 53 Downloads: 9 Uploads: 0	you could just use the edit /delete button below your messages

08-25-09, 04:41 PM	#7
Trool323 Sparky Join Date: May 2007 Location: southwest ohio Posts: 154 Downloads: 25 Uploads: 0	Ubisoft will only put out a product that the mass public has a chance at being able to play on their home pc. Otherwise no one will buy it because they won't be able to play it. Right now the average computer is a duel core with a gig of ram in it, with an onboard pc express graphic card. I suspect a system like this will be the minimum REQs. If you want the game to run like a champ you'll probably need a quad core with 2 gig.. think back when SH4 was released it used the last of the AGP 8x tech and it took a pentium 4 with 1 gig as a minimum req.. So you have to allmost double that for SH5 I would imagine. But the old sayin goes will just have to wait and C

08-27-09, 07:18 AM	#8
Wintahs A-ganger Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Belgium Posts: 79 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 0	That's the budget standard, not a gamer's standard. I'm you'l be fine with 2GB RAM, a decent Dual Core and a 7600GT(As a minimum)

09-06-09, 03:53 PM	#14
Tarnsman Electrician's Mate Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 134 Downloads: 48 Uploads: 0	The main thing Ive found in re performance and longevity in a system is the Front Side Bus. I got a 3.2mhz PIV running a 800fsb and it only cost me a few months and a few extra dollars over the 533mhz fsb. Im so glad I got it I cant tell you. My single core rig is still competitive after 3+ years,with Gpu upgrades. A limited fsb will be a bottleneck on the cpu, ram, gpu everything. So next rig will be 1600mhz fsb for me.