DRM

Onkel Neal · 08-10-09, 04:30 PM

Wal-mart has to check receipts to inhibit dishonest people from stealing them blind. Want to blame someone for this travesty against your rights? Blame the jerks who shoplift.

I gladly show my receipt, glad to have a chance to help.

CaptainHaplo · 08-10-09, 05:23 PM

The only time I have ever been asked for the reciept is if there is a really large item that could easily have been missed by the cashier if I didn't point it out (which I have had to do on occasion). True, I could tell em no, but whats the point? They are looking to stop big ticket losses through cashier error or attempted theft. As a law abiding - and a law UPHOLDING citizen, I am more than happy to let em scan the reciept for 5 seconds to see that the item is listed, and then be on my way. By doing so, I am helping them keep prices lower. After all, if someone gets a $1200 flat screen because it wasn't checked - that loss has to be made up from somewhere.

Yea I could be an ass and refuse and let em make a stink and then sue them over the fact I had paid for it and they didn't have a right to stop me leaving with MY merchandise. But like I said - is it really worthwhile to make an ass out of yourself over them simply trying to stop high dollar losses?

Aramike · 08-10-09, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHaplo

The only time I have ever been asked for the reciept is if there is a really large item that could easily have been missed by the cashier if I didn't point it out (which I have had to do on occasion). True, I could tell em no, but whats the point? They are looking to stop big ticket losses through cashier error or attempted theft. As a law abiding - and a law UPHOLDING citizen, I am more than happy to let em scan the reciept for 5 seconds to see that the item is listed, and then be on my way. By doing so, I am helping them keep prices lower. After all, if someone gets a $1200 flat screen because it wasn't checked - that loss has to be made up from somewhere.

Yea I could be an ass and refuse and let em make a stink and then sue them over the fact I had paid for it and they didn't have a right to stop me leaving with MY merchandise. But like I said - is it really worthwhile to make an ass out of yourself over them simply trying to stop high dollar losses?

Exactly. It's one of those little things that can help a great deal.

To look at it as though you're proving that you didn't steal something is the wrong perspective, as proving that you paid for something does not necessarily mean stealing.

Btw, I recently bought a TV from Best Buy, and they checked my reciept too.

Skybird · 08-10-09, 06:45 PM

well, until last year, early summer, I part-time-jobbed as a cashier in a small warehouse for some years, and occasionally I and colleagues did ask for receipts of people if they carried items that were sold in that shop, too. It is perfectly legal to do so, and the receipt is the only evidence that you legally bought something, that's why it is important that you take that damn piece of paper with you even if buying just some chewing gum - and then enter another shop.

And if you are being stopped and asked for a receipt, you cannot sue them for asking you, not under german or EU law. They do not have the right to search you if you do not comply, but they have the right to hold you, to hinder you from leaving, and to call the police. And the police has the right to search you, without you being able to sue them for that, don't be mistaken there. And that's what happened quite some times while I was jobbing there.

They ask, you prove that you legally bought the item in question by showing your receipt. That simple it is. What is the freaking problem?

Shoplifting was a big problem there, even more since they were fighting for their economic survival. The daily loss equalled 2 worker's monthly payments. That's a mark where the fun ends at the latest, I would say.

And what has all this to do with software DRM? Nothing.

Let's get the thread back on track.

DRM is meant to hinder piracy, and more and more it is also meant to prevent second-hand selling of software that the producers prefers to sell himself at full price. So DRM last but not least is about controlling and ending the second hand market, like it was with preventing the legal possibility to record public programs from TV and radio buy encoding CDs with copy protections - legally you still are allowed to record their content. It's just that you are not legally allowed to crack their copy protection scheme. that you cannot do the first without doing the second is - an unfortunate coincidence only, of course. Who could have forseen that complication?

Platapus · 08-10-09, 07:09 PM

There are stores where in the process of checking your receipt also mark it to prevent the practice of reusing a receipt which used to be a pretty good way to shoplift.... or so a "friend" told me.. yeah that's it. My friend.

SUBMAN1 · 08-10-09, 07:42 PM

The RIAA gave up on DRM now, so even they know its not in their, or anyones best interest for that matter.

As for software, Oblivion had no DRM and I happily bought the deluxe version to support that model. Fallout 3 had minimal DRM and I bought that too.

RIAA Spokesperson Declares DRM Dead

http://www.dailytech.com/RIAA+Spokes...ticle15739.htm

-S

08-10-09, 04:30 PM	#1
Onkel Neal Born to Run Silent Join Date: Jan 1997 Location: Cougar Trap, Texas Posts: 21,385 Downloads: 541 Uploads: 224	Wal-mart has to check receipts to inhibit dishonest people from stealing them blind. Want to blame someone for this travesty against your rights? Blame the jerks who shoplift. I gladly show my receipt, glad to have a chance to help. __________________ SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web

08-10-09, 05:23 PM	#2
CaptainHaplo Silent Hunter Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 4,405 Downloads: 31 Uploads: 0	The only time I have ever been asked for the reciept is if there is a really large item that could easily have been missed by the cashier if I didn't point it out (which I have had to do on occasion). True, I could tell em no, but whats the point? They are looking to stop big ticket losses through cashier error or attempted theft. As a law abiding - and a law UPHOLDING citizen, I am more than happy to let em scan the reciept for 5 seconds to see that the item is listed, and then be on my way. By doing so, I am helping them keep prices lower. After all, if someone gets a $1200 flat screen because it wasn't checked - that loss has to be made up from somewhere. Yea I could be an ass and refuse and let em make a stink and then sue them over the fact I had paid for it and they didn't have a right to stop me leaving with MY merchandise. But like I said - is it really worthwhile to make an ass out of yourself over them simply trying to stop high dollar losses? __________________ Good Hunting! Captain Haplo

08-10-09, 06:45 PM	#4
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,729 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	well, until last year, early summer, I part-time-jobbed as a cashier in a small warehouse for some years, and occasionally I and colleagues did ask for receipts of people if they carried items that were sold in that shop, too. It is perfectly legal to do so, and the receipt is the only evidence that you legally bought something, that's why it is important that you take that damn piece of paper with you even if buying just some chewing gum - and then enter another shop. And if you are being stopped and asked for a receipt, you cannot sue them for asking you, not under german or EU law. They do not have the right to search you if you do not comply, but they have the right to hold you, to hinder you from leaving, and to call the police. And the police has the right to search you, without you being able to sue them for that, don't be mistaken there. And that's what happened quite some times while I was jobbing there. They ask, you prove that you legally bought the item in question by showing your receipt. That simple it is. What is the freaking problem? Shoplifting was a big problem there, even more since they were fighting for their economic survival. The daily loss equalled 2 worker's monthly payments. That's a mark where the fun ends at the latest, I would say. And what has all this to do with software DRM? Nothing. *Let's get the thread back on track.* DRM is meant to hinder piracy, and more and more it is also meant to prevent second-hand selling of software that the producers prefers to sell himself at full price. So DRM last but not least is about controlling and ending the second hand market, like it was with preventing the legal possibility to record public programs from TV and radio buy encoding CDs with copy protections - legally you still are allowed to record their content. It's just that you are not legally allowed to crack their copy protection scheme. that you cannot do the first without doing the second is - an unfortunate coincidence only, of course. Who could have forseen that complication? __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

08-10-09, 07:09 PM	#5
Platapus Fleet Admiral Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,403 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 0	There are stores where in the process of checking your receipt also mark it to prevent the practice of reusing a receipt which used to be a pretty good way to shoplift.... or so a "friend" told me.. yeah that's it. My friend. __________________ abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.

08-10-09, 07:42 PM	#6
SUBMAN1 Rear Admiral Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 11,866 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	The RIAA gave up on DRM now, so even they know its not in their, or anyones best interest for that matter. As for software, Oblivion had no DRM and I happily bought the deluxe version to support that model. Fallout 3 had minimal DRM and I bought that too. RIAA Spokesperson Declares DRM Dead http://www.dailytech.com/RIAA+Spokes...ticle15739.htm -S __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode