Realism hit? with stabilized view

[onelifecrisis]

Originally Posted by Paul Riley

Sorry,just let me clarify you would have stabilization off?

Nope. I said I would have "no scope stabilisation" unchecked.
SH3's use of double nagatives is annoying!

Originally Posted by Paul Riley

Do you remember the scene in Das Boot,where the captain was about to fire at the incoming destroyer they had just spotted,and the waves were rolling all over the scope,yet the actual crosshair remained quite stable,if not perfectly still.

I've not seen Das Boot, but I know it's a movie and therefore unlikely to be in any way realistic.

Not that a videogame is realistic either, but, yeah... er, whatever.

[Paul Riley]

Originally Posted by onelifecrisis

I've not seen Das Boot, but I know it's a movie and therefore unlikely to be in any way realistic.

You've not seen Das Boot? ,man i'm surprised,I thought that was under the belts of everyone in here.I know what you mean about movies though.

[Hitman]

Das Boot is a good film based on a good book, but there are still some obvious shortcomings when it comes to reflecting reality accurately. German periscopes had split prism stadimeters in many models, others (mainly the observation periscopes) didn't. But even so, once you have the hang of it it isn't that difficult to get range to target -not completely accurate, but at least accurate enough for our purposes-. The problem is that convincing people who are still not veteran with this game that practice will make masters out of them, is very difficult . But trust me, if you understand the mechanics of how it worked in real life, and practice a LOT, somewhen it all will suddenly fall in place.

[Sailor Steve]

I agree that the stabilized views are not historical, but also agree that while SH4 gives us a realistic split-image view, SH3 does not. Stabilized Views is the only way to get it to hold still, at least for me.

[Paul Riley]

Steve

So using stabilized view would not exactly appear as cheating then?,it could simulate having some stabilizing mechanism in the periscope.

Were these devices available in the 1940s?

[Hitman]

Using the image stabilization should NOT be considered cheating in scopes with split-prism stadimeter (Like the one simulated in OLC's GUI) and should be considered cheating in mods that do not simulate split prism periscopes like for example my Optics mod.

When you have a split prism stadimeter in your periscope -which was used already in the 20s by Zeiss f.e. and only later incorporated by the US submarines, despite the stadimeter being an american invention by Lt. Fiske- the image still moves, but because it moves exactly the same in both split images, you don't notice it and can anyway measure the angle subtended with high accurancy.

Does this clarify the matter for you?

[Paul Riley]

Originally Posted by Hitman

Does this clarify the matter for you?

It sure does,case closed!
Stabilizers are,ON!

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Paul Riley

Steve

So using stabilized view would not exactly appear as cheating then?,it could simulate having some stabilizing mechanism in the periscope.

Were these devices available in the 1940s?

What Hitman said. Stabilizers weren't available, but the split image device was. Take a look at SH4 - it's just right there. Since SH3 doesn't have it, use the stabilized view.

And "Cheating" is in the mind of the player. I do things a certain way because anything else seems like cheating to me. But I do things that others consider cheating, so there you are!

[Paul Riley]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

But I do things that others consider cheating, so there you are!

Steve,I guess we all do things that feel right to us eh?
I mean,stabilize view is the only thing I have enabled now,oh and god view , which I will be having off someday as I get used to manual plotting without god putting them there for us. Thats not so bad is it.

Anyway,thanks all.